Solving the Schrödinger equation for hydrogen atom

raul_l
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello. I'd like to solve this: -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \Psi(r,\theta,\phi) -U(r) \Psi(r,\theta,\phi) = E\Psi(r,\theta,\phi)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I can separate the variables, but that's about it.

\frac{1}{R(r)} \frac{d}{dr}(r^2 \frac{d}{dr}R(r))+\frac{2mEr^2}{\hbar^2} + \frac{2m\gamma r}{\hbar^2} = C_r

\frac{1}{F(\phi)} \frac{d^2}{d\phi^2} F(\phi) = C_\phi

-C_r-\frac{sin\theta}{P(\theta)} \frac{d}{d\theta} (sin\theta \frac{d}{d\theta} P(\theta))=C_\phi


The answer should be something like this but I don't know how to get there.
\psi_{nlm}(r,\vartheta,\varphi)=\sqrt{{\left(\frac{2}{n a_0} \right)}^3\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n(n+1)!}}e^{-\rho /2} \rho^{1} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1}(\rho)\cdot Y_{lm}(\vartheta, \varphi)


If somebody could offer me any idea on how to proceed that would be great. I'm not even sure of how to choose the righ boundary conditions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raul_l said:

Homework Statement



Hello. I'd like to solve this: -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \Psi(r,\theta,\phi) -U(r) \Psi(r,\theta,\phi) = E\Psi(r,\theta,\phi)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I can separate the variables, but that's about it.

\frac{1}{R(r)} \frac{d}{dr}(r^2 \frac{d}{dr}R(r))+\frac{2mEr^2}{\hbar^2} + \frac{2m\gamma r}{\hbar^2} = C_r

\frac{1}{F(\phi)} \frac{d^2}{d\phi^2} F(\phi) = C_\phi

-C_r-\frac{sin\theta}{P(\theta)} \frac{d}{d\theta} (sin\theta \frac{d}{d\theta} P(\theta))=C_\phi


The answer should be something like this but I don't know how to get there.
\psi_{nlm}(r,\vartheta,\varphi)=\sqrt{{\left(\frac{2}{n a_0} \right)}^3\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n(n+1)!}}e^{-\rho /2} \rho^{1} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1}(\rho)\cdot Y_{lm}(\vartheta, \varphi)


If somebody could offer me any idea on how to proceed that would be great. I'm not even sure of how to choose the righ boundary conditions.


the derivation is done in almost all quantum mechanics textbooks so you should look on up.
It's a long derivation.

There are two apporaches to this problem: the DE's are standard ones and one can simply look up the solutions. However, if you have to prove the solutions from scratch, you must start with a series expansion. Again, all the details are in QM textbooks
 
Ok, this looks pretty complicated (not suprisingly).

I'll start with the azumuthal equation.

\frac{d^2}{d\phi^2} F(\phi) = C_\phi F(\phi)

The solution is in the form F(\phi)=Ae^{B\phi}

which gives me
\frac{d^2}{d\phi^2} Ae^{B\phi} = C_\phi Ae^{B\phi} \Rightarrow -AB^2 e^{B\phi} = C_\phi Ae^{B\phi} and therefore C_\phi=-B^2

Due to constraints on the wavefunction F(\phi)=F(\phi+2\pi)

which means that Ae^{B\phi}=Ae^{B(\phi+2\pi)}=Ae^{B\phi} e^{2B\pi} \Rightarrow e^{2B\pi}=1 \Rightarrow B=im where m is an integer.

Because of normalization \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F(\phi) d\phi=1 and therefore A=1.

I have arrived at F(\phi)=e^{im\phi}
and C_\phi=-m^2

which means that -C_r-\frac{sin\theta}{P(\theta)} \frac{d}{d\theta} (sin\theta \frac{d}{d\theta} P(\theta))=-m^2

Thanks for your help so far. I'll keep on working on this.
 
I'm half way solving the colatitude equation (I know how to solve differential equations using series expansion).

However, this is a lot of work I think it would probably be a better idea to just look it up in a QM textbook.

I have one question though.
Why is C_r=l(l+1) ? I can't find the answer anywhere.
 
I have a problem with solving the general Legendre equation.

As we know the series solution is in the form
\sum a_s x^s

I have found the formula for the coefficients
a_{s+2}=-a_s \frac{(l-s)(l+s+1)}{(s+1)(s+2)}

Now, if l=s then a_{l+2} and all subsequent coefficients become zero.

In the book it says that the highest coefficient a_l is given by the formula a_l=\frac{(2l)!}{2^l (l!)^2} but I don't see how. :confused:

If I set a_0=1 I get
a_s=\frac{(l-s+2)(l-s+4)...l(l+1)(l+3)...(l+s-1)}{s!}

If l=s then
a_l=\frac{2*4*...*l(l+1)(l+3)...(2l-1)}{l!}

I don't know how to proceed. The best I can do is write it like this:
a_l=\frac{(2l)!}{1*3*...(l-1)(l+2)(l+4)...2l*l!}

which is pretty close to \frac{(2l)!}{2^l (l!)^2} but not exactly.
 
which book?
 
Mathematical Methods For Physicists by Tai L. Chow

Of course, there is always the possibiliy of a mistake in the book.
 
  • #11
At the bottom of page 298.
 
  • #13
  • #14
Yes, as far as I know.

Actually, they use the series expansion method to solve the Laguerre equation. But the Legendre equation is solved differently. I think it's quite clever.
 
  • #15
Hello again.

I'm having trouble evaluating \frac{(-1)^l}{2^{2l} (l!)^2} \frac{(2l)!(l+m)!}{(l-m)!} \int_{-1}^{1} (x^2-1)^l dx

which should be \frac{2}{2l+1} \frac{(l+m)!}{(l-m)!}

My first thought was to use the Newton's binomial formula to evaluate the integral.
\int_{-1}^{1} (x^2-1)^l dx = \int_{-1}^{1} \sum_{k=0}^l \frac{l!}{k!(l-k)!} (x^2)^{l-k} (-1)^k = (\sum_{k=0}^l \frac{l!}{k!(l-k)!(2l-2k+1)} x^{2l-2k+1} (-1)^k) _{x=-1}^{x=1}

Since (2l-2k+1) is always odd (x^{2l-2k+1})_{x=-1}^{x=1} always yields 2.

Therefore
\frac{(-1)^l}{2^{2l} (l!)^2} \frac{(2l)!(l+m)!}{(l-m)!} \int_{-1}^{1} (x^2-1)^l dx = \frac{(-1)^l}{2^{2l} (l!)^2} \frac{(2l)!(l+m)!}{(l-m)!} \sum_{k=0}^l \frac{l!}{k!(l-k)!(2l-2k+1)} (-1)^k = \frac{(-1)^l}{2^{2l} l!} \frac{(2l)!(l+m)!}{(l-m)!} \sum_{k=0}^l \frac{1}{k!(l-k)!(2l-2k+1)} (-1)^k

I don't know how to proceed (or if I've been correct so far).
Btw, here x substitutes cos \theta but I don't think that changes anything.
 
Back
Top