Solving the Sugar Content in Potato Flour Puzzle with Chemistry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the molar ratio between glucose (RCHO) and permanganate ions (MnO4-) in a chemistry experiment involving potato flour. The participant outlines their experimental process, which includes the use of amylases, Fehling's solution, and titration with potassium permanganate. They analyze the molar ratios derived from the chemical reactions, concluding that the ratio between RCHO and MnO4- appears to be 1:0.4, suggesting that for every mole of MnO4-, there are 2.5 moles of RCHO. However, they express confusion about the logic behind this conclusion and seek clarification on the correct molar ratio. The discussion highlights the complexities of stoichiometry in chemical reactions and the need for clear reasoning in deriving molar relationships.
rnielsen25
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi everyone, i have a problem. My brain is short-circuited, and it seems like i can't find out the simplest chemistry in the world :D

We made this experiment where we should determine the sugar content in potato flour. We added amylases to break down the starch to glucose. Then we added fehling's solution and isolated the sediments. Then we added some ammoniumiron(III)sulphate. Last we titrated the solution with potassiumpermanganate.

My problem is that i need to find the molar ratio between the sugar/glucose and the permanganate-ion.

Homework Equations


The chemical reactions is given by the following reactions.

1. 5OH- + RCHO + 2Cu2+ --> RCOO- + Cu2O + 3H2O
2. 2H+ + Cu2O + 2Fe3+ --> 2Cu2+ + 2Fe2+ + 2H2O
3. 8H+ + 5Fe2+ + MnO4- --> 5Fe3+ + Mn2+ + 4H2O

The Attempt at a Solution


The molar ratio between RCHO and Cu2O is 1:1. So is the ratio between Cu2O in equation 1 and 2.
The molar ration between Cu2O and Fe2+ is 1:2. So the ratio between RCHO and Fe2+ is also 1:2. But the ratio between Fe2+ in equation 2 and 3 is 2:5. So the ratio between Fe2+ and RCHO is 1:(2*2,5) = 1:5? Because there for every Fe(II) in equation 2 there is 2,5 Fe(II) in equation 3.

But the then the ratio between Fe2+ and MnO4- in equation 3 is 5:1.
So the ratio between MnO4- and RCHO is what? 5:5? That cannot be true?

My logic says 1:2,5. But i can't explain why. It maked sense to me at first, but when i tried to explain why, i couldn't. Could you help me figure out what the real molar ratio is, and how to explain why it is that? Sorry, that i suddently can't figure out the simplest chemistry and math in the world :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well i just tried working it out entering numbers. Which i think makes more sense to me.

If i have 1 mol RCHO, i have 1 mol Cu2O.
Then i have 2 mols Fe2+
In equation 3 i still have 2 mol Fe(2+, which means i have 2/5 mol MnO4-.

Then the molar ratio between RCHO and MnO4- must be 1:0,4. Which means for every mol of MnO4- i have 2,5 mol RCHO.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top