Solving the Uncertainty Principle Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem related to the uncertainty principle, where the user calculated momentum (P) using a wavelength of 0.1 femtometer and derived an energy (E) of 1.5e14 eV. However, the expected answer is 12 GeV, prompting confusion about the calculation process. It was clarified that at such high energies, relativistic effects cannot be ignored, making the non-relativistic equation E = p²/2m inappropriate. Instead, the correct approach involves using the relativistic equation E² = m₀²c⁴ + p²c², which aligns with the expected result. Understanding this distinction resolves the discrepancy in the energy calculation.
Epif
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3249/question.jpg

Homework Equations


P=h/lambda
E=p^2/2m


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I calculated P using a wavelength of .1 femtometer. Then I plugged it into the energy equation. However, I got 1.5e14 eV, while the answer sheet says it's supposed to be 12 GeV. Have I done something wrong wrong? On the answer sheet my professor calculated P, and I got the same answer he got, but after that he just says therefore E=12GeV, not showing how he came to that conclusion.

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot neglect relativistic effects at such high energies, thus the equation
E = \frac{p^{2}}{2m} does not hold.
Instead you should use the relativistic equation
E^{2} = m_{0}^{2} c^{4} + p^{2} c^{2}
 
Ahh that makes sense and gives e the right answer. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top