Solving Torque in Stretcher/Paramedic Problem-Unsure About Fulcrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter katieoneill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fulcrum Torque
AI Thread Summary
To solve the torque problem involving two paramedics carrying a stretcher, it's essential to identify the fulcrum for torque calculations. The fulcrum can be considered as either paramedic A or paramedic B, depending on which side's forces are being calculated. Both calculations should yield forces that, when combined, equal the weight of the body on the stretcher, confirming the system is in static equilibrium. There is no standard rule for finding the fulcrum in non-obvious scenarios, but visualizing the pivot points can aid in understanding. Ensuring that the forces balance correctly is key to solving the problem accurately.
katieoneill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've seen a similar problem posted here but the answer to my question was not included. The details of my problem are not so important as I do not require a solution, just help in one aspect of the problem: finding the fulcrum in order to calculate torques to balance each other (in order to find the forces contributed by either side).

The problem is 2 paramedics carrying a stretcher with some body of some mass with a center of gravity closer to one paramedic. I was unsure of where the fulcrum would be in order to calculate torque. I did the problem by calculating the torque for paramedic A using the fulcrum as paramedic B and vice versa, but I have no idea if this is correct. It seems odd to use 2 fulcrums in a problem, but it seems to me when I visualize the problem that the pivot point for each side is the other side.

Can anyone please help me with this? Also, is there a standard rule of thumb for finding the fulcrum in problems where it is not obvious (obvious like a seesaw or wrench).

THANK YOU!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you take paramedic A as fulcrum and calculate the force for paramedic B; and then you take paramedic B as fulcrum and calculate the force for paramedic A...do they both add up to the weight of the body? In other words, you solved for the forces knowing the the stretcher is not rotating, fine; now, you can use the static equation (the stretcher is not moving up or down, either) to verify that the forces from the paramedics equal the force down from the body. If so, you have solve the problem correctly.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top