Solving Trigonometric Equation: Alternate Methods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Short term memory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Stuck Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation 2 cos 2x - 4 cos x + 3 = 0 within the interval 0 < x < 2π. The user attempts to simplify the equation using the identity for cos 2x, leading to a quadratic form that is challenging to factor. After some manipulation, they arrive at (2cos x - 1)² = 0, which yields solutions of cos x = 1/2, corresponding to x = 60° or 300°. The user expresses frustration over the complexity of the problem but ultimately finds a solution. The conversation touches on the challenges of returning to trigonometry after a break, highlighting the importance of practice and familiarity with identities.
Short term memory
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
ok here's the problem i haven't taken trig for like 2 years and suddenly i have been thrown back into it...

problem: 2 cos 2x - 4 cos x + 3 = 0 0 < x < 2 pi

my work (used cos 2 x = 2 cos^2 x - 1)

4 cos^2 x - 2 - 4 cos x + 3 = 0

4 cos^2 x - 4 cos x + 1 = 0

ok now here is my problem if i try and factor it out i ll be left with the a really ugly 1/ ( 4 cos x)

is there another equation i could use... is my logic flawed... is there an easier way... do i just have to do it the ugly way... ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2cos2x - 4cosx + 3 = 0
2(2cos^{2}x-1) - 4cosx + 3 = 0
4cos^{2}x - 4cosx + 1 = 0
(2cosx-1)^{2} = 0
cosx = 1\2
x = 60 deg. or 300 deg.
 
3.14159265358979 said:
2cos2x - 4cosx + 3 = 0
2(2cos^{2}x-1) - 4cosx + 3 = 0
4cos^{2}x - 4cosx + 1 = 0
(2cosx-1)^{2} = 0
cosx = 1\2
x = 60 deg. or 300 deg.

... me stupid...

PS having a little to much fun with pi arn't we... you should go out to atleast when pi gets to 123456789...
 
Short term memory said:
PS having a little to much fun with pi arn't we... you should go out to atleast when pi gets to 123456789...


"There is not enough room in this margin..." :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top