Solving Uncertainty Problem with .7g Lateral Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter purduegrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating experimental uncertainty for lateral acceleration reported as .7g based on a skidpad test. Participants explore the formula A = v^2/r, where they adjust the skidpad's radius and vehicle speed measurements to estimate uncertainty. Despite initial confusion, calculations suggest the uncertainty should be around 4.45%, although some participants arrive at different figures like 8% or 3.8%. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationships between radius, speed, and time in the context of lateral acceleration. Ultimately, the group seeks clarity on the correct approach to achieve the desired uncertainty percentage.
purduegrad
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:

A magazine publishes lateral acceleration capability from cars it tests. Measurements are made using a 150' diameter skidpad, the vehicle path deviates from the circle +/- 2 ft and the vehicle speed is read from a fifth wheel sensor measuring the system to +/- .5 mph. Then it says to estimate the experimental uncertainty if the reported lateral acceleration is .7g.

All I can think of is A=v^2/r...and some how i would have to cut the 150 diameter into 75 as a radius. I got 75 +/- .0133. then i found v = to 22.69, and you have to square that...I'm basically stumped...the answer is like 4.XX% :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did the calculation and I got 8%.
 
hmm well its supposedly like 4.45%, i have a feeling this has something to do with partial derivatives?
 
no, you don't need partial derivatives to solve it. Ill get back to you with the answer, by the way, how many feet in a mile?
 
5280 feet in mile
 
I Still can't get it, I get something liek 3.8%.
 
yeah but I am not given any information about times
 
try substitution. T = d/v. The equation then becomes
A = \frac{1.226rv^2}{d^2} Does that help?
Given the uncertainty of measurements in the quantities r and v, the answer is there. I agree with the 4.xxx% result, see what you get.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I'm still not following how to get that 4.45 answer, can you please elaborate for me?
 
Back
Top