Can we prove that there are infinitely many primes congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Competition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sequence defined by a_n = [n + 2n/3] + 7 contains infinitely many primes. It is established that a_n is congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5) for specific values of n, leading to the conclusion that the sequence includes all numbers congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5) except for a few exceptions. To demonstrate the infinitude of primes in this sequence, it is argued that if only finitely many primes exist congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5), a constructed number will yield a prime factor not included in the finite list, contradicting the assumption. Thus, it is concluded that there are infinitely many primes congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5) and consequently infinitely many primes in the sequence. The discussion effectively reinforces the existence of these primes through logical reasoning and modular arithmetic.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
I am attaching three problems in math, that were part of a competition at my country. I am lost in all of them, i don't know even how to begin. if someone could tell me how to do them, i would really appreciate?
So can anybody solve them and post the answers?
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could you post the questions rather than attach to documents? No one likes doc attachments incase of viruses.
 
Gib Z said:
Could you post the questions rather than attach to documents? No one likes doc attachments incase of viruses.


so here it is:

I am just writing down the problem 3


Show that the sequence

a_n=[n+2n/3]+7 contains infinitely many primes? [], i am sure you know wht this means, however its meaning is the whole part, or integer.
 
Observe that an is congruent to 3, 0, or 2 (mod 5) when n is congruent to 1, 2, or 0 (mod 3) respectively. Indeed, if n = 3k + m (where m is either 0, 1, or 2), then:

an
= [(3k+m) + (6k+2m)/3] + 7
= 5k + m + 7 + [2m/3]
= 5(k+1) + m + 2 if m = 0, 1 [which give 5(k+1) + 2, 5(k+1) + 3 respectively]
OR 5(k+1) + m + 3 if m = 2 [which gives 5(k+2)]

In fact, it's not hard to see that the sequence contains every number congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5) except for 2, 3, and 7. To prove the sequence contains infinitely many primes, it suffices to show that there are infinitely many primes that are congruent to either 2 or 3 (mod 5), that is, not every non-5 prime is congruent to either 1 or 4 (mod 5). So suppose that there are only finitely many primes congruent to 2 (mod 5), and only finitely many congruent to 3 (mod 5). Call them p1, ..., pq, where p1 = 2. Consider the number:

5p2...pq+2

It's congruent to 2 (mod 5), so its prime factors cannot all be congruent to 1 or 4 (mod 5). It is co-prime to all the primes p2, ..., pq because these numbers are all greater than 2, and it is co-prime to 2 (i.e. it's odd) because p2, ..., pq are all odd. Therefore it must have a prime factor congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5) that isn't in our list p1, ..., pq, contradicting our assumption that we could find a finite enumeration of the primes congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5). So there are infinitely many such primes, and hence infinitely many primes in the sequence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top