Some help with oscillations and damping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on damped harmonic oscillations, specifically analyzing the effect of a friction coefficient, gamma, set at half the critical damping value. It establishes that when gamma is zero, the period T is given by T = 2π/ω, while for gamma at half the critical damping, T becomes T = 4π/ω. The textbook states the ratio of the damped period to the undamped period is 2/√3. Participants express confusion about calculating the ratio of two successive swings on the same side, suggesting the use of the equation for motion x = x₀ e^(-γt/2) cos(ω_d t + θ) to find the necessary values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of substituting the correct values into the equations to derive the desired ratios.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
Consider damped harmonic oscillations. Let the coeffient of friction gamma be half the value of the one that just gies critical damping.

How many times is the period T larger than it would be for gamma = 0??

WHen gamma is zero -

T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}

When gamma is half of the value for critical damping

now for critical damping

\frac{\gamma}{2} = \omega_0

So then for the question, (half of the value for gamma) then

that yields omega / 2

and then gives a period T = \frac{2 \pi}{\frac{\omega}{2}}

and that gives T = \frac{4 \pi}{\omega}

which is half the period for the case when gamma is zero

My textbook says the answer - the ratio between T(damped) and T(undamped) = 2 / root(3)

Determine the ratio between two successive swings on teh same side.

It doesn't quite give the case for WHICH case it wants us to consider but it is definitely related to the previous question

I am completely baffled as to how to go about this

do i plug this into the equation for the damping that is

= x = x_0 e^{\frac{\gamma t}{2}} Cos(\omega_d t + \theta)
Answer of the text is X2/X1 = exp (-2pi / 3) i don't know how
i am not sure

your help is greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i can help u with the first part
\omega_{damping}=\sqrt{\omega_{0}^{2}-\frac{\gamma^{2}}{4}} (1)

,okay??

Now find the value for gamma for which \omega_{damping} is zero...That means "critical value"...

Take half of that value and plug it in (1).Then compare the angular freqeancies omega zero and omega damped...U'll find the answer.

Daniel.
 
thats helpful

however for the second part is it somehow related to the first part in a sense that for one the time is t=0 and the other is time t= 2 / root 3?

and then find the ratio betweeen the two x values??
 
Take in the equation of movement (x=x(t)) t=0 and T=T_{damped} and take the ratio of the 2 values...You might take the initial phase arbitrary,since anyway it won't matter...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Take in the equation of movement (x=x(t)) t=0 and T=T_{damped} and take the ratio of the 2 values...You might take the initial phase arbitrary,since anyway it won't matter...

Daniel.

and the equation of movement is
= x = x_0 e^{\frac{-\gamma t}{2}} Cos(\omega_d t + \theta)

so when i substitute the value of gamma = omega (which i got from the part 1)

then for the equation for damped turns to = x = x_0 e^{\frac{-\omega_{0} t}{2}} Cos(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\omega_d t + \theta)

lets seay we start looking at swings starting from t = t and then the next swing o nteh same side is t = (root3 / 2) +t??

and then sub into the x0 quation and find the ratio between the two>??
 
No,that number involving the sqrt is to be put in the exponential olny.When taking the ratio of the 2 "x"-s,the cosine part vanishes (is simplified through),so it doesn't matter whether u put or not in the cosine...

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top