Some questions about electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the electric potential as illustrated in several provided graphs, particularly regarding the behavior of voltage in the presence of conductors. It emphasizes that the voltage remains constant within a conductor, even when external objects are introduced. The graphs depict various stages of voltage changes before and after the insertion of a second object, highlighting the opposing internal electric fields created by hollow conductors. Participants seek detailed explanations for each labeled phenomenon in the diagrams. The inquiry aims to clarify the principles of electric potential in conductive materials.
aoiwy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/2231/p1040967s.jpg
(for the above grah, the plate is inseted in the middle)


http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/7662/p1040968s.jpg
(for the above grah, the plate is inseted in the middle)


http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7476/conductor1.jpg


http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/7110/conductor2.jpg









Refering to the above graphs, can anyone help explain the phenomenons of several stages labelled? (a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j)

thx for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The grapsh show voltage versus position on a horizontal line going through the middle of the depicted objects, with "before" meaning without the presence of the second object in the middle or on the right in the diagragms, and after meaning with the presence of the second object. It seems the main idea is to show that the voltage doesn't change within a conductor. The first diagram shows the case where a hollow conducting object sets up up an opposing internal field.
 
Last edited:
Yes.
But I'd like to know every labelled phenonmenon in detail.
(and I know there're really a lot of questions =P)
anyway, thanks for your answer.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top