Some questions on the Dyson expansion of the S matrix

robousy
Messages
332
Reaction score
1
I have some questions regarding:

S = \sum_{n=0}^\infty\ S^n = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{i^n}{n!} \idotsint \ {d^4x_1}\ {d^4x_2}<br /> \dots \ d^4x_n \ T (H_I(x_1) \ H_I(x_2) \dots \ H_I(x_n) )<br />

1) What is n? How do you pick n given some interaction? ( I think it might be the order in perturbation theory...)

Now, consider the QED interaction:

H_I(x)=-eN({\overline{\psi}(x)<br /> <br /> \def\lts#1{\kern+0.1em /\kern-0.65em #1}<br /> \lts{A}(x) \psi(x) )<br /> <br /> <br />

Now

2)I know I have to go to n=2 here and use Wicks theorem here and do some contractions...but I don't really understand what to contract or how to do it.

3) Is Wicks theorem used because its the only way we know how to work out Time ordered Normal products?

4) Is everything considered a field, ie are \psi , \overline{\psi} \: and \: \Its{A} all considered fields.

5) Can I express contractions in Latex? If so how please??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org



1) n is the number of interaction vertices in the Dyson expansion. It is determined by the order in perturbation theory, as each term in the expansion represents a certain order of the perturbative calculation. For example, the first term (n=0) corresponds to the tree-level approximation, while the second term (n=1) corresponds to the first-order correction, and so on.

2) In QED, the Dyson expansion involves calculating the expectation value of the time-ordered product of the interaction Hamiltonian H_I(x) at different points in space-time. To do this, we can use Wick's theorem to expand the time-ordered product into a sum of normal-ordered products. Then, we can use the rules of normal ordering to simplify the expression and calculate the expectation value. The contraction refers to pairing up the creation and annihilation operators in the normal-ordered product to get a simpler expression.

3) Yes, Wick's theorem is used because it is a powerful tool for simplifying time-ordered products and calculating expectation values in perturbation theory. It is specifically designed for working with time-ordered normal products.

4) Yes, in QED, all the fields mentioned (ψ, ψ̅, and A) are considered fields.

5) Yes, you can use Latex to express contractions. The contraction of two fields A and B can be written as <AB> or <A,B>, depending on your preference.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top