Something I can't seem to prove

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skynt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two algebraic expressions involving factorials. The user struggles to simplify the left-hand side, particularly with the term [n - (i + 1)]!. They note that the formula relates to Pascal's triangle, indicating its combinatorial significance. The challenge lies in combining the fractions effectively to demonstrate their equivalence. Assistance is sought to clarify the algebraic manipulation required for the proof.
Skynt
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
It should be really simple, but I think the algebra is bogging me down:

\frac{n!}{(n-i)! i!} + \frac{n!}{[n-(i+1)]! (i+1)!} = \frac{(n+1)!}{(n-i)! (i+1)!}

Can anyone show me the process of proving this? I don't see how the two expressions are equal...

essentially I can't get rid of the [n - (i + 1)]! term when I try to combine the two fractions and expand things.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Notice that [n - i] * [n - (i + 1)]! = [n - i]!.
 
obviously *bangs head* thanks!
 
That is, by the way, the formula used for producing Pascal's triangle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top