Sound Intensity- just need someone to check my work

AI Thread Summary
At a rock concert, sound intensity at 5 meters from the speakers is 145 dB, which is harmful to hearing. To reduce the intensity to a safe level of 90 dB, calculations indicate a distance of approximately 2812 meters, which seems excessive. A more practical approach suggests that doubling the distance from the sound source results in a 6 dB decrease, leading to a rough estimate of needing to be around 2560 meters away to reach 91 dB. The discussion highlights the simplifying assumptions in the calculations, noting that real-world sound distribution may vary. Ultimately, the conclusion emphasizes the importance of maintaining safe distances from loud sound sources like rock concerts.
cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Sound Intensity-- just need someone to check my work :)

Homework Statement



While enjoyable, rock concerts can damage people's hearing. In the front row at a rock concert, 5m from the speaker system, the sound intensity is 145 dB. How far back would you have to sit for the sound intensity to drop below the recommended safe level of 90 dB?

Homework Equations



\DeltaB=10 log(I1/I2)

I1/I2=r2^2/r1^2, so \DeltaB = 20 log (r2/r1)

The Attempt at a Solution



Plugging into the above equation yields (145-90) = 20 log (r2/5)

Rearranging, r2 = 5*10^[(145-90)/20] = 2812 m. I don't know where I could've made a mistake-- this is a pretty straightforward problem-- but that answer seems unreasonable.

Does it look alright to you?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This is correct under the simplifying (but not totally correct) assumption that all the sound power from the concert is a concentrated point source.

A better model would be a combination of point sources or a distributed line source.
 


Thanks! The course I'm taking makes a LOT of simplifying assumptions haha.
 


cep said:
Thanks! The course I'm taking makes a LOT of simplifying assumptions haha.

You can get a rough estimate using the idea that if you double the distance from a sound source, you get a 6dB drop in level.

5m - 145 dB
10m - 139 dB
20m - 133 dB
40m - 127 dB
.
.
.
2560 - 91 dB

so you are after an answer a bit bigger than that, so you are correct.

The question is probably twisted tutor's attempt to tell you to stay away from rock concerts!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top