Sound intensity of a thunderbolt

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the sound intensity of a thunderbolt 1 km away, with the assumption that sound dissipates over a distance of 20 km. Using relevant equations, the user calculated a sound intensity difference of 26 dB, which raised concerns about its realism, as it suggests a significant drop in sound intensity over a relatively short distance. Participants acknowledged the calculations were correct but pointed out that the assumption of sound completely disappearing at 20 km is unrealistic. Additional resources were suggested for exploring sound absorption and intensity further. The conversation highlights the complexities of sound propagation in real-world scenarios.
Mulz
Messages
124
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Find the sound intensity of a thunderbolt 1 km away. What sound intensity (dB) is it 1 km away? The thunderbolt can be heard up to 20 km away. The sound is spherical. The air absorbs nothing.

Homework Equations


L = 10 \cdot lg(\frac{I_1}{I_0})
\Delta L = 10 \cdot lg(\frac{I_2}{I_1})
I = \frac{p_0 ^2}{2z}
dim(I) = \frac{P}{4πr^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I went by the assumption that the sound dissipates at the distance of 20 km. I used equation 4 and found that

I_1 = \frac{p}{4πr_1^2} and
I_2 = \frac{p}{4πr_2^2} with r1 being 1 km and r2 20 km. I divided them and got \frac{I_2}{I_1} = \frac{r_1^2}{r_2^2} = \frac{1}{400} and implemented this in the second equation and got a difference of 26 dB.

This physically makes no sense. How can it be 26 dB difference at a 19 km difference? Whispering is louder. Assuming the sound is completely gone at 20 km, that would mean it's 26 dB at a distance of 1 km away from the lightning. This is obviously wrong and I cannot see the problem with my calculations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mulz said:
This physically makes no sense. How can it be 26 dB difference at a 19 km difference? Whispering is louder. Assuming the sound is completely gone at 20 km, that would mean it's 26 dB at a distance of 1 km away from the lightning. This is obviously wrong and I cannot see the problem with my calculations.
Your calculations look correct. Yes, the answer obviously does not correspond to reality. An assumption was made in this problem that might be unrealistic.

See Table B.2 here: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Air_Absorption.html

Or play with some values here: http://resource.npl.co.uk/acoustics/techguides/absorption/
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top