Sound: Stones falling from cliffs

AI Thread Summary
A stone dropped from a cliff creates a splash heard 2.1 seconds later, with sound traveling at 343 m/s. The equations used to calculate the height of the cliff led to confusion, particularly regarding the time taken for the stone to fall and the sound to return. The calculated time for sound travel (t2) should not exceed the total time of 2.1 seconds, indicating an error in the approach. A rough estimate suggests the cliff height is around 20 meters, based on the physics of free fall. The discussion emphasizes the importance of logical reasoning in physics problems to avoid unrealistic results.
Ritzycat
Messages
170
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A stone is dropped from the top of a cliff. The splash it makes when striking the water below is heard 2.1s later. The speed of sound in air is 343 m/s. How high is the cliff?

Homework Equations


Δx=½at^2
t_1+t_2=2.1s
t_2=x/343m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


I used those equations to mathematically solve for the value of x. However I was getting bizarre answers when I solved the system of equations. t1 or t2 should not be more than 2.1s, as that is the total time from when it was dropped and the sound traveled back up. I set down as negative, so I used -9.8 for a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry but i don't understand why you used a as -9.8m/s², if you took that as your sign convention,then your first equation would be,
-x=½(-9.8)t₁².
Post your calculation, you should be getting an equation with √x and x.
 
after some manipulation/substitution

343/t_2=0.5(9.8)(2.1-t_2)^2

t_2=5.6s

T2 being the amount of time it takes for the sound to travel back up to the top of the cliff. It should not be a longer amount of time than the time it takes for the stone to fall AND for the sound to come back up. (2.1s) I don't know what's wrong here!
 
Do you think 343/t2 has the dimension of a distance ? If sound travels 343 m/s, does it go 171.5 m in 2 seconds ?
 
Ritzycat said:
after some manipulation/substitution

343/t_2=0.5(9.8)(2.1-t_2)^2

t_2=5.6s

T2 being the amount of time it takes for the sound to travel back up to the top of the cliff. It should not be a longer amount of time than the time it takes for the stone to fall AND for the sound to come back up. (2.1s) I don't know what's wrong here!

This is a bit tricky. Can you estimate what h is?
 
Dear Ritz,

Physics is also about gut feeling. If something falls less than 2.1 seconds, it doesn't fall much further than ##{1\over 2}\; 9.81 \; 2^2 \approx 20## meter. So t2 is really small. If you get 5.6 seconds, you know it's wrong.

You knew it was wrong anyway, right ? I saw you write t1 + t2 = 2.1 somewhere and I don't think going back in time is in order here :wink:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top