Sources of Error in Youngs double slit experiment

AI Thread Summary
In Young's double slit experiment, systematic and statistical errors can significantly impact results, especially when using a laser pointer as a light source. Systematic errors arise from consistent inaccuracies in measurement methods, while statistical errors relate to the variability of measurements. It's essential to analyze all measured values and the methods used to determine their accuracy. Variances between experimental results and theoretical predictions may indicate measurement errors, such as incorrect slit spacing. Understanding these errors is crucial for accurately interpreting the experiment's outcomes.
danepaj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
we used a laser pointer as a light source

Homework Equations


I'm having trouble looking for an error in the experiment.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Well... what kinds of error are there?
What sort of thing gives rise to each kind?
 
my teacher doesn't accept any human error so it should all be systematic I guess
 
There are systematic and statistical errors - besides downright mistakes, which your teacher is calling "human error".
Ignoring mistakes ... systematic and statistical errors come in every time you measure something, or use a value that someone else has measured.
So list everything you have measured and pay attention to how you measured it.
How inaccurate was the measurement (statistical error), and was there anything about the method that could have given a consistently high r low reading (systematic error)?
 
Consider a possible purpose of experimentation: to understand a seemingly cold and detached equation; you are understanding how the experiment yielded the equation: conversely, how might a variance between equation and experiment signify you have made a mistake?

From this perspective, notice how the variables in your equations:

dsin(Θ) = mλ
dsin(Θ)= (m + 1/2)λ

May have influenced your results; for example: was the order of interference you observed counter to what it should have been? (m as dependent upon the ratio of the product of distance between slits and the color of laser used). In this scenario, one error could have been that you spaced the slits too far apart, so d was too great.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top