Spacetime expansion effects on wavelength of travelling light

AI Thread Summary
Current theories of cosmological expansion account for the effects of expanding space on light traveling through it, resulting in redshift akin to light escaping supermassive objects. As light travels, its wavelength increases by a factor of 1+z, corresponding to the expansion of distances in the universe. Cosmologists utilize a time-dependent scale factor, a(t), to track these distances, indicating that if z = 1, distances have doubled since the light was emitted. This redshift phenomenon primarily pertains to large-scale distances between points at rest relative to cosmic background radiation, rather than small-scale distances within our solar system or galaxy. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate observations of distant supernovae and the universe's expansion rate.
H2Bro
Messages
164
Reaction score
4
Hello,

Do current theories of cosmological expansion take into account the effects expanding space would have on a beam of light traveling through space? i.e. if an expanding medium of gas with constant pressure decreases the temperature/velocity of particles, would an expanding medium of space decrease the velocity of light? (not sure what the analog of pressure is for spacetime...)

given light's constant speed I assume this would actually redshift the wavelength akin to light exiting supermassive objects. If unaccounted for, this effect might mean observations of SN1A events overestimate distance as well as rate of expansion.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The normal way to think about cosmological redshift is as an expansion effect. It is handled pretty much as your post suggests.

During transit the light's wavelength increases by a factor of 1+z, and that happens if distances in the U have increased by a factor of 1+z while the light was traveling.

Cosmologists use a time dependent number a(t) called "scale factor" to keep track of distances.

If z = 1 that means distances (and wavelengths) have doubled. That means the ratio of scalefactor NOW a(now) to scalefactor THEN when light was emitted is
a(now)/a(then) = 2. Distances now are twice as big as when light was emitted and started on its journey to us.

These are LARGESCALE distances between widelyseparated points each of which is at rest relative to the cosmic background radiation. Not smallscale distances within our solarsystem or galaxy.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top