Special Relativistic force problem.

ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the radius of the Earth’s orbit around the sun (1.5 *10^13cm = 1AU), the flux of radiation from the sun is 10^6 erg/<br /> cm^2·sec . Now consider a spherical dust grain of radius r with internal density
\rho = 2g/cm^3, at some distance R from the sun. Assume that the grain is at rest with respect to the sun. Use the fact that radiation flux falls with distance from a source as 1/R2 Ignore the gravity of the Earth in this problem, but not the gravity of the Sun. Use Newtonian gravity and ignore general relativistic

Homework Equations



I won't both writing them out but we can easily derive the force from the flux & gravity effects on the particle.

Now here is where things get a bit sticky for me. I want to just set these forces equal and solve as per the usual, but I am assuming that the problem must be trickier than that considering this an upper level course.

My teacher suggested that we set both equal to the 3-vector momentum and go from there, but I derived the same results doing this as I did just setting the two equations equal.

Where am I going wrong here? Or am I solving this the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top