Special relativity: components of a metric tensor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the covariant and contravariant components of the metric tensor in Minkowski space using spherical coordinates. The covariant components identified include g_{00}=1, g_{11}=-1, g_{22}=-r^{2}, and g_{33}=-r^{2}sin^{2}\theta. The relationship g_{\mu\sigma} g^{\mu\rho} = \delta^{\rho}_{\sigma} is confirmed as correct, indicating that the contravariant components are the inverses of the covariant ones. The participants clarify that the expression ds^{2}=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu} involves summation over 16 values, with only the diagonal components being significant. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of the understanding of the metric tensor's structure.
Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An interval in Minkovski space is given in spheric coordinates as;

ds^{2}=c^{2}dt^{2}-dr^{2}-r^{2}d\theta^{2}-r^{2}sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}

Now I have to find the covariant and contravariant components of the metric tensor.

Homework Equations



General expression of a metric tensor is:
G=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu} which also equals ds^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution


I have some messy answer written down from the lecture, but can't get it clear.
Seems that I have written down the covariant components of the metric as
g_{00}=1
g_{11}=-1
g_{22}=-r^{2}
g_{33}=-r^{2}sin^{2}\theta
Are these the covariant components that the problem asks me to find? How are they found?

I see a correlation in the Schwarzschild metric

G=[PLAIN]http://rqgravity.net/images/gravitation/Gravitation-92.gif

After this it seems that the lecturer has written down that

g_{\mu\sigma} g^{\mu\rho}=\delta^{\rho}_{\sigma}

Is this correct?

So I get a matrix on which all the components on the main diagonal are 1. From there I can derive that the contra-variant components of the metric are simply inverses of the above covariant metric.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you expand the implied summations in ds^2 = g_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu[/tex], you get<br /> <br /> ds^2 = g_{00} dx^0 dx^0 + g_{01}dx^0dx^1 + \cdots + g_{32}dx^3dx^2 + g_{33}dx^3dx^3<br /> <br /> Keeping in mind that x^0 = t, x^1 = r, x^2 = \theta, and x^3 = \phi, compare that expression to <br /> <br /> ds^2 = dt^2 - dr^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2<br /> <br /> You can just read off the components of g_{\mu\nu}.<br /> <br /> Your notes are correct in that g_{\mu\sigma}g^{\mu\rho}=\delta^\rho_\sigma. Consider<br /> <br /> x_\rho = g_{\rho\sigma} x^\sigma=g_{\rho\sigma}g^{\sigma\mu}x_\mu<br /> <br /> You can see that all g_{\rho\sigma}g^{\sigma\mu} does is change the label of the index on x_\mu. In other words, it&#039;s just the identity.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

A well, actually I have a question still.
The bit:

ds^{2}=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu}

indicates summation over 16 (4x4) values, yes? With only the main diagonal being significant on the g.

EDIT: yes, that is what happens.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top