Special relativity & length contraction

Denton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Ive heard that length contraction does not occur when the movement of the object is perpendicular to the observer. Is this correct?

Say two identical rings were traveling at each other at relativistic speeds, whilst the observer is perpendicular to them. Ring A would see ring B contract and therefore pass through whereas ring B would see ring A contract and go through it. Since both can't contract AND pass through each other as seen by the perpendicular observer, it does not apply to perpendicular frames of reference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denton said:
Ive heard that length contraction does not occur when the movement of the object is perpendicular to the observer. Is this correct?
What do you mean when you talk about movement that is "perpendicular to the observer"? "Observers" don't have one single angle that they measure things, they have coordinate systems which cover all of space. For any object, no matter what the direction, in the observer's own coordinate system the object's length will be contracted along the axis parallel to its direction of motion in that coordinate system, and uncontracted along the axis perpendicular to its direction of motion.
Denton said:
Say two identical rings were traveling at each other at relativistic speeds, whilst the observer is perpendicular to them. Ring A would see ring B contract and therefore pass through whereas ring B would see ring A contract and go through it.
This isn't very clear. Is the plane of each ring (the plane where the ring appears to be 'lying flat') perpendicular to its direction of motion? If so, only the ring's thickness will be contracted, its diameter won't be.
 
Last edited:
oh right perpendicular to the object, not the observer. Never mind me.
 
let's say you have what you see as a perfect cubical shaped box when it is in your frame of reference (not moving relative to you). let's say the sides of the box are aligned with some perpendicular x, y, and z axes. now let's say that you fly that box past you in the direction of the x axis at some relativistic speed. the length of the side of the box along the x axis will be contracted, from your perspective, while the lengths of the sides along the y and z axes will not be contracted. the box will no longer look like a cube but will look squished in the x axis sense of direction, the same direction of relative movement.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top