Special Relativity Problem from Rindler

Jason Williams
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the inertial frame ##S'## the standard lattice clocks all emit a 'flash' at noon. Prove that in ##S##, this flash occurs on a plane orthogonal to the ##x##-axis and traveling in the positive ##x##-direction at speed ##\frac{c^2}{v}##.

Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations: ##x' = \gamma(x-vt)## and ##t' = \gamma(t - \frac{vx}{c^2})##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The second part is relatively simple, set the flash to occur @ ##t' = 0## and then solve the corresponding Lorentz transformation equation to get ##\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{c^2}{v}##. The part I don't understand is show to show that it's orthogonal to the ##x##-axis. I know you want to end up showing that ##dx = 0##, I just can't manage to manipulate the Lorentz equations to get it in that form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jason Williams said:

Homework Statement


In the inertial frame ##S'## the standard lattice clocks all emit a 'flash' at noon. Prove that in ##S##, this flash occurs on a plane orthogonal to the ##x##-axis and traveling in the positive ##x##-direction at speed ##\frac{c^2}{v}##.

Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations: ##x' = \gamma(x-vt)## and ##t' = \gamma(t - \frac{vx}{c^2})##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The second part is relatively simple, set the flash to occur @ ##t' = 0## and then solve the corresponding Lorentz transformation equation to get ##\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{c^2}{v}##. The part I don't understand is show to show that it's orthogonal to the ##x##-axis. I know you want to end up showing that ##dx = 0##, I just can't manage to manipulate the Lorentz equations to get it in that form.

I think you are looking at orthogonal the wrong way. It simply means a plane defined by the x-coordinate (where the y and z coordinates can be anything). Those are are the planes orthogonal to the x-axis.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top