Special Relativity Rocket Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem involving two rockets, A and B, departing from a space station with perpendicular velocity vectors. Participants are tasked with determining the relative velocities of the rockets, specifically vba and vab. The confusion arises from the fact that these velocities do not point in opposite directions, which is explained by the principles of special relativity, emphasizing that space is not absolute and is dependent on the observer's frame of reference. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how velocities transform in relativity, particularly when dealing with perpendicular vectors. Ultimately, the discussion encourages deeper contemplation of the nature of space and velocity in the context of relativity.
dpeagler
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
1. Two rockets, A and B, leave a space station with velocity vectors va and vb relative to the station frame S, perpendicular to each other.

(a) Determine the velocity of A and to B, vba.

(b) Determine the velocity of B relative to A, vab.

(c) Explain why vab and vba do not point in opposite directions




Homework Equations


U' = ( U - v ) / (1 - (vU/c^2) )



The Attempt at a Solution


I have mulled over this problem for a while now and I know that since we don't have values for the velocities that U' will be some percent of U, but I am getting confused on the fact that the two velocity vectors are perpendicular to each other, which I didn't think would matter.

Perhaps there is something to the vector being extended by both vectors simultaneously increasing?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I completed part A and B, but have no idea why the two vectors aren't opposite of each other. If anyone could just nudge me into the correct thinking that would be amazing.
 
I'm totally not amazing, but I may share my opinion on this. The conventional idea about space is that space does NOT change howsoever you look at it, regardless of the reference frame you choose. That the distance between 2 points is fixed regardless of reference frame is one example. That means, space is an absolute thing. But, as far as I understand, relativity theory has pointed out that notion is not true, i.e. space is dependent on the viewpoint. Therefore I think comparing the direction of Vab and Vba is quite pointless (not really "pointless" because at least, it bugs us to think more about relativity :biggrin:). Each vector is defined in its corresponding reference frame, in its own space. There is no reason to be surprised at that Vab and Vba "are not in opposite direction", as that's meaningless when it comes to relativity.
But, what do I know? :rolleyes:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top