Special relativity, summation agreement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the correct application of indices in the context of special relativity equations. The initial equation presented is partially correct, but there are issues with index manipulation that need clarification. It emphasizes that repeated indices indicate summation, specifically highlighting the relationship between covariant and contravariant components. The correct formulation involves expressing the differential distance squared as a double sum over the indices. Proper handling of these indices is crucial for accurate calculations in the theory of relativity.
Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://www.hot.ee/jaaniussikesed/valem_kovar_erlt.bmp

The first half of the equation is okay, but, after the second equal sign I started to improvise, did I mess up or is it correct? Trying to understand the indexes.

ds being the differentially small distance between events, dx the location vector? (not a 4 vector, I'm not sure on the English here) with covariant and contra-variant components present and the g is the metric tensor with its components marked by the indexes.

Regards,
Uku
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
so i think you have got your indicies a little mixed up, a reapeted indicex, means to sum over the index, so start with
dx_{\mu} = g_{\mu \nu} dx^{\nu}

so in this case the sum is over the repeated \nu, teh sum would then become a double sum
ds^2 = dx^{\mu} dx_{\mu} = dx^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} dx^{\nu}

see this for more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_and_lowering_indices
 
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top