(SPECTROSCOPY) chromium(III) absorb light

AI Thread Summary
Chromium(III) absorbs light due to the excitation of electrons when photons are absorbed by the atom. This process elevates electrons to higher energy orbitals. Subsequently, the excited electrons do not remain in these higher states and return to lower energy levels. During this transition, a new photon is emitted, which occurs in a random manner. Understanding this atomic-level interaction explains the light absorption characteristics of chromium(III).
sunbuster
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why does chromium(III) absorb light? Explain what is happening on an atomic level.

-> I don't really get this problem. Can you help me out...? Please...


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens when a photon "excites" an electron in an atom?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
What happens when a photon "excites" an electron in an atom?

=>>> I wrote the answer for this question like this.

Because the photons are absorbed by an atom, an election attains a higher energy orbital. The electron won't stay up there. The electron falls to a lower energy level and a new photon is emitted. The photon is emitted in a more or less random reaction.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

How are the isomers of tris(acetylacetonato) chromium(III)?
Replies
2
Views
2K
How Long to Coat a Sphere with Chromium?
Replies
13
Views
4K
Chemistry Why Do Sulfurous Compounds Show Different Peaks in X-ray Absorption Spectra?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Which Option Should I Choose for the Complex Ion Based on the Given Information?
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Do You Calculate Equilibrium Concentrations in a Redox Reaction?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Chemistry Absorption of light by molecules and the reasons for this
Replies
19
Views
10K
Identity of metal from electrolysis
Replies
3
Views
3K
Chemical Equilibrium and Le Chatelier's Principle
Replies
20
Views
4K
Analysis of Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy results
Replies
6
Views
3K
Determining the Appropriate Oxidation State of Chromium in a Reaction
Replies
3
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top