Spectroscopy Light Sources: Books & Web Links

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding resources related to standard light sources used in spectroscopy, specifically standard lamps. Participants clarify the distinction between radiance and irradiance sources, with the initial inquiry specifying a need for radiance sources. A suggested link to a product page for a radiance source is provided. The conversation emphasizes the importance of identifying the correct type of light source for spectroscopy applications. Resources for standard lamps in spectroscopy are essential for accurate measurements and experiments.
ljubak
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone point me to good books or good web links that deal with standard light sources (standard lamps to be precise) used in spectroscopy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ljubak said:
Can someone point me to good books or good web links that deal with standard light sources (standard lamps to be precise) used in spectroscopy?

Are you looking for a radiance source or an irradiance source?
 
seycyrus said:
Are you looking for a radiance source or an irradiance source?

Radiance source.
 
See http://www.gamma-sci.com/products/rs10b.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Creating a wavelength selectable light source with diffraction grating
Replies
2
Views
2K
I How does atomic absorption spectroscopy work
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Electron counterpart of pseudothermal light source for quantum experiments
Replies
0
Views
811
I How to couple light from a very small source into spectrometer?
Replies
10
Views
1K
B Does light ever go from the eye to the image?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Looking for information on gamma light sources
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Liquid Scintillation Counting: External source to determine efficiency
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Why does my ceiling glow in the dark?
Replies
12
Views
4K
I New muon g-2 calculation consistent with experiment
Replies
0
Views
3K
Quantum Books on Practical Laser Applications for Spectroscopy Enthusiasts
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top