Speed and Momentum of a Beta Particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed and momentum of a beta particle emitted from a 14C nucleus. The initial calculations were based on non-relativistic equations, yielding an incorrect speed of 2.31 x 10^8 m/s, which exceeds the speed of light. Participants emphasize the necessity of using relativistic formulas for energy due to the high kinetic energy of 127 keV. The correct approach involves applying relativistic equations to accurately determine the speed and momentum of both the beta particle and the remaining nucleus. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing when to switch from classical to relativistic physics in particle physics problems.
ihearyourecho
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 14C nucleus, initially at rest, emits a beta particle. The beta particle is an electron with 127 keV of kinetic energy.

A) What is the speed of the beta particle?
B) What is the momentum of the beta particle?
C) What is the momentum of the nucleus after it emits the beta particle?
D) What is the speed of the nucleus after it emits the beta particle?

Homework Equations



v = √[ 2K / m]

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so this is my work, but it gives the wrong answer.

Kinetic energy of beta particle K = 127 keV = 127 * 10 ^ 3 eV
= 127 * 10 ^ 3 * 1.6 * 10 ^ -19 J
= 203.2* 10^ -16 J

K = ( 1/ 2) mv ^ 2
v = √[ 2K / m]
m=9.11* 10 ^ -31 kg
v = 2.31* 10 ^ 8 m / s
THIS IS NOT RIGHT.

Can someone help me out where my thinking was flawed please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ihearyourecho! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
ihearyourecho said:
K = ( 1/ 2) mv ^ 2
v = √[ 2K / m]
m=9.11* 10 ^ -31 kg
v = 2.31* 10 ^ 8 m / s
THIS IS NOT RIGHT.

The speed of light is c = 3*108 m/s,

so your v is about 0.77 c, which is far too large to be able to use non-relativistic formulas. :redface:

You need the relativistic formula for energy. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top