Speed as a ratio, but what about work done and moments?

AI Thread Summary
Speed is defined as the ratio of distance traveled per unit time, while work done is calculated as force multiplied by the distance moved in the direction of that force. The rationale behind this multiplication is rooted in the mathematical relationships established to quantify physical concepts. Understanding that speed is a rate of change over time helps clarify why work is defined as force times distance, as moving an object over greater distances requires more work. The discussion emphasizes the importance of intuitive understanding in grasping these relationships, suggesting that many equations arise from considering linear or inversely linear relationships. Ultimately, recognizing these foundational principles enhances comprehension of physical concepts like work and moments.
rvgene
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Speed is a ratio of the distance traveled per unit time. But what then is work done and moments?

For example, work done is force multiplied by the distance traveled in the direction of the force. But how would you explain the rationale of multiplying these two quantities?

As in, in the case of speed, the unit is m/s, which makes sense, but something like moments, with units of Nm, it looks as though it does not make much sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

There is no mystery here. These are all just useful mathematical relationships people figured out once upon a time. There's nothing special about multiplying or dividing...or squaring, for that matter... to get them.

However: Speed is a rate. An amount of something done per unit time. Any measure of an amount of something done per unit time is divided by time. Whether it's power (J/s), rotational rate (r/m or rpm), or hot dogs eaten per hour on dollar dog day (Hotdogs/h).
 
I am just wondering why work done is force x distance and not, let's say force/distance.

How did the idea of work done being force multiplied by distance come in the first place?
 
rvgene said:
I am just wondering why work done is force x distance and not, let's say force/distance.

How did the idea of work done being force multiplied by distance come in the first place?

If you move an object over twice the distance, it's twice as much work. :smile:
 
I like Serena said:
If you move an object over twice the distance, it's twice as much work. :smile:

ahh... that makes more sense now. same thing for moments right?
 
rvgene said:
ahh... that makes more sense now. same thing for moments right?

Yep! :smile:

Most of these equations (can) come about by thinking about them and considering whether the relationship will be linear or inversely linear. :wink:

Thinking about it that way will also give you an intuitive understanding that IMO is very important!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top