Speed of a disc after a collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the change in momentum after a collision involving two discs, where one disc is initially stationary. The user calculates the final momentum of disc B but encounters confusion regarding the negative value of its momentum, questioning the validity of their approach. It is emphasized that momentum is a vector quantity, requiring careful consideration of direction in calculations. The conversation suggests that for analyzing disc B, one should focus solely on its parameters without involving disc A, especially since their trajectories are at right angles post-collision. The importance of vector addition in momentum calculations is highlighted to avoid misinterpretation of results.
Pochen Liu
Messages
52
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2018-11-16_15-0-20.png

upload_2018-11-16_14-59-7.png

I understand that if the change in impulse is 0.25, that because disc B is originally stationary the momentum disc B will have is equal to the impulse.

My question is how do we do this in terms of change in momentum?

Homework Equations


ΔP = Pf - Pi
P = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


ΔP = Pf - Pi
0.25 = Pf - (0.517 * 1.21)
Pf = 0.87557

Ps of the system = 0.62557
Ps = Pa + Pb = 0.87557 + Pb = 0.62557
Pb = -0.25
vb = -0.365

Why does this approach give the negative version of the answer?
I know what I've done isn't quite right because (Ps = Pa + Pb = 0.87557 + Pb = 0.62557) essentially states somehow the momentum in the system has increased with no external torque.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-16_14-59-7.png
    upload_2018-11-16_14-59-7.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 597
  • upload_2018-11-16_15-0-20.png
    upload_2018-11-16_15-0-20.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 580
Physics news on Phys.org
Pochen Liu said:
0.25 = Pf - (0.517 * 1.21)
Momentum is a vector. You cannot add and subtract quantities like this unless they are known to be in the same direction. From the diagram, it is clear that the initial velocity of A is at some angle to the impulse.

For part bi) you do not need to consider A at all. Just think about the info you have regarding B.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
$$ \vec{P_{ai}} = \vec{P_{af}}+\vec{P_{bf}} $$ and since post collision trajectories are at right angles: $$ \lvert\vec{P_{ai}}\rvert^2 = \lvert\vec{P_{af}}\rvert^2+\lvert\vec{P_{bf}}\rvert^2 $$
 
  • Like
Likes Pochen Liu
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top