Speed of car dependent on what factors

AI Thread Summary
The speed of a car rolling down a hill, disregarding friction, is primarily dependent on the height of the hill and the acceleration due to gravity, as these factors influence the potential energy converted to kinetic energy. The length of the hill does not affect the final speed if friction is ignored. If friction is considered, it reduces the car's speed at the bottom due to energy loss, which must be accounted for in the energy conservation equation. The energy at the top equals the kinetic energy at the bottom minus the work done by friction. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related physics problems.
lilycat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Disregarding friction, if a car was rolling down a hill, what would the speed of the car at the bottom of the hill, be dependent on? Either the height of hill, length of hill, rotational inertia or the acceleration due to gravity.

Homework Equations


Without friction wouldn't the length and height of the hill not matter?
Would the answer be different if friction was significant?

The Attempt at a Solution


If the height and the length don't matter then wouldn't it be the acceleration due to gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the speed of an object can be thought of as its Kinetic Energy (energy of motion). It sounds like a question relating to Conservation Of Energy in my opinion. Do you know about Conservation of Energy? If so, think about the energy the car has at the top of the hill (Hint: The energy the car has at the top must be equal to the energy it has at the bottom, if no energy was lost due to friction.) Try coming up with a equation that sets the initial energy at the top of the hill to the energy at the bottom of the hill, and algebraically solve for the velocity. Hope this helps.

- idrach55
 
Are we to assume that the car STARTS at the top of the hill (that is, from rest) or that it has reached some sort of "terminal velocity" before the question is asked?
 
idrach55 said:
Well, the speed of an object can be thought of as its Kinetic Energy (energy of motion). It sounds like a question relating to Conservation Of Energy in my opinion. Do you know about Conservation of Energy? If so, think about the energy the car has at the top of the hill (Hint: The energy the car has at the top must be equal to the energy it has at the bottom, if no energy was lost due to friction.) Try coming up with a equation that sets the initial energy at the top of the hill to the energy at the bottom of the hill, and algebraically solve for the velocity. Hope this helps.

- idrach55

Okay I understand what you are saying. But if energy was lost due to friction what would happen to the problem?)
 
If friction was added to the problem, some of the energy the car had at the top of the hill would be lost due to friction by the time the car reached the bottom. The energy lost due to friction would be the work done by the friction. Thus you would end up with the Kinetic at the bottom equaling the Potential at the top (assuming the car started from rest) minus the work done by friction. That minus is there because the work done by friction can be thought of as negative (opposite direction) to the work done by gravity in going down the hill.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top