Speed of Hydrogen combustion out of a tube?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the escape velocity of hydrogen from a tube when one end is open and the other is closed. The original poster suggests using the ideal gas law (PV=NRT) to determine the volume of combusted hydrogen and proposes a method involving flame speed and volume expansion. However, a response indicates that the calculations presented may mix unrelated phenomena and lack coherence. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more accurate approach or relevant equations to achieve a correct estimation of escape velocity. Overall, the inquiry highlights the complexities involved in combustion dynamics and gas flow calculations.
Jason White
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Please post this type of questions in the HW section using the template.
Hello, I was curious about how to calculate how fast the escape velocity of hydrogen out of a tube/cylinder would be. Once end of the cylinder is closed, the other is open, obviously.

Assume the cylinder is full of hydrogen at 1 atm. My thought is that you could use PV=NRT to calculate the volume of the hydrogen once combusted and then imagine a sphere that had that equivalent volume. Online i found that the max flame speed of hydrogen is 3.06 m/s. I think you could start from the center of the sphere and calculate how long it would take to fill that volume if you went out radially at that speed(radius/3.06 m/s). Take the volume and divide it by the time to get the rate.

Once you have that rate, you could take the rate of the combustion (Vol/sec) and divide that by the volume of the cylinder to get the multiple. For example: if the rate of combustion is 1000L/sec and the cylinder is 1 L, then the gas will expand to 1000x the volume of the cylinder in 1 second. By multiplying the length * the multiple(1000) and dividing by 1 second, that would give a decent approximation for the escape velocity of the gas coming out of the tube. Them multiplying that by the mass/sec (flow rate) gives you the thrust.

Does this seem reasonable? Or is there an equation i can use for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not for school, just my own curiosity.
 
I am afraid you are mixing completely irrelevant and independent phenomena and the calculation you did doesn't make any sense.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top