Speed of light in an inertial frame

In summary: Sagan once said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." This quote is especially relevant to the discussion at hand. I believe that the speed of light does remain constant for an observer who is accelerating towards a Schwarzschild black hole, but there is a paradox to be dealt with. Namely, that the light never reaches the observer. However, this paradox can be resolved by understanding that the light is always travelling in a curved trajectory and that the observer never actually crosses the event horizon.
  • #1
MeJennifer
2,008
6
Does the speed of light for an observer falling into a black-hole remain the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
in which frame?
 
  • #3
Using local clocks and local rulers, the speed of light stays constant. However, the rate of change of the Schwarzschild 'r' coordinate with respect to the Schwarzschild 't' coordinate for a light beam falling into a black hole does not remain the same.

I think this has been discussed several times, you might want to look up the old threads.
 
  • #4
Yeah that was a great analogy you gave, pervect.
 
  • #5
That is a good question, MeJenn. The answer is yes, the speed of light does remain constant for an observer who is accelerating towards a siingularity.o:) However, there is a paradox to be dealt with.:bugeye: That is that the light never does reach the observer. :eek: Similarly, if another observer outside the Swarschild radius were to send a messaage toward the observer in the black hole, it would never be received. Furthermore, and slightly less astonishing, if the inner observer were to attempt to radio or signal the outer observer, the signal would never pass the Swarschild radius.:rolleyes: All this is due to the relativistic warping of space-time in the presence of a singularity.:confused:
 
  • #6
baryon said:
That is a good question, MeJenn. The answer is yes, the speed of light does remain constant for an observer who is accelerating towards a siingularity.o:) However, there is a paradox to be dealt with.:bugeye: That is that the light never does reach the observer. :eek:

The light does reach the infalling observer. For an observer free-falling into a Schwarzschild black hole from infinity, light from infinity will be visible to the observer crossing the event horizon and will be redshifted by a factor of 2:1.

(This was worked out in some other thread, I could dig for the details if you're really interested, but you'd need some familiarity with GR to follow the calculation).
 
  • #7
Pervect, I don't want to get into an argument with you about this. However I strongly believe that I said the same in my post that you said in yours before it, only using less-abstract terms.:confused:
Here's my understanding of the subject; The light entering the black hole would never reach an observer already inside the black hole due to the infinite warping of space-time. Now the light would be red-shifted to obliviion but it still would never reach the observer. An outside observer would never see the light cross the Schwarzschild radius.
I am probably not as familiar with general relativiity as you so I wouldn't benefit from seeing those equations. But I would benefit from an explanation of how I'm wrong and the equations are right.
 
  • #8
baryon, that's not what he said, he said the opposite
 
  • #9
baryon said:
Here's my understanding of the subject; The light entering the black hole would never reach an observer already inside the black hole due to the infinite warping of space-time. Now the light would be red-shifted to obliviion but it still would never reach the observer. An outside observer would never see the light cross the Schwarzschild radius.
Isn't that just a coordinate singularity? According to the Schwarzschild metric, nothing crosses the horizon in finite coordinate time, but it does cross in finite proper time.
 
  • #10
pervect said:
The light does reach the infalling observer. For an observer free-falling into a Schwarzschild black hole from infinity, light from infinity will be visible to the observer crossing the event horizon and will be redshifted by a factor of 2:1.

(This was worked out in some other thread, I could dig for the details if you're really interested, but you'd need some familiarity with GR to follow the calculation).

I don't believe that this is correct. In Schwarzschild coordinates, an infalling observer gets stuck on the event horizon. In falling light also gets stuck on the event horizon, but if the light is sufficiently delayed with respect to the observer, it will not catch up with him.

To see this, transform to Painleve coordinates where the observer reaches the singularity in finite coordinate time. If the infalling light begins travel in such a way that it does not reach the singularity at that time, then there is no way for the observer to have seen that light.

If you transform this situation to Schwarzschild coordinates then the observer and the light can be made to approach the same point on the event horizon which seems to be a violation of the Painleve calculation which shows that the two never meet. But in the Schwarzschild coordinates the two never actually reach the event horizon so there is no contradiction. Instead, one must remember that one cannot make statements about events at points where there is a coordinate singularity.

Carl
 

What is the speed of light in an inertial frame?

The speed of light in an inertial frame is a fundamental physical constant that is equal to approximately 299,792,458 meters per second (m/s). This value is the same for all observers in inertial frames, regardless of their relative motion.

Why is the speed of light in an inertial frame considered a constant?

The speed of light in an inertial frame is considered a constant because it does not change regardless of the observer's relative motion. This was first discovered by physicist Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in inertial frames.

How does the speed of light in an inertial frame affect time and space?

The constant speed of light in an inertial frame has implications for time and space. According to Einstein's theory of special relativity, as an object approaches the speed of light, time will slow down and length will contract in the direction of motion. This phenomenon is known as time dilation and length contraction.

Can anything travel faster than the speed of light in an inertial frame?

According to the laws of physics, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in an inertial frame. This is because as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases exponentially, making it impossible to reach the speed of light. Therefore, the speed of light is considered to be the universal speed limit in the universe.

How is the speed of light in an inertial frame measured?

The speed of light in an inertial frame is measured using various methods, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment, which compares the speed of light in different directions. Other methods include using the speed of light to define the meter in the International System of Units (SI) and using the time dilation of moving particles to calculate the speed of light.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
74
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
850
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
59
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top