Speed of light - permeability?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the reasons behind the difference in the speed of light in various media compared to a vacuum. It suggests that light travels at speed c in a vacuum due to the absence of interactions, while in air and other materials, particles may slow it down through interactions. The idea is proposed that photons may travel at speed c between interactions but experience delays due to these interactions with electrons. Responses indicate that while this thinking is on the right track, the collective behavior of atoms in solid media also significantly influences optical properties. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of light's behavior in different environments.
lntz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
so what i am about to write is quite possibly wrong, but this is just how i was thinking about why the speed of light is different in a vacuum as it is in glass or water etc. i am writing this to see whether my train of thought is on the right lines, and if it isn't to hopefully get an insight into the way i should think about it.

if the speed of light, c, is 3x10^8 ms-1 approx. in a vacuum (free space), because there is nothing there for the light to 'knock into' or interact, and therefore nothing to slow it down, i think of it as a kind of 'resistance' (i know this isn't a correct term to use here, but they're similar ideas). and in air the speed of light is somewhat slower due to the fact that there are particles moving about in this free space, i might assume, that it is these particles that slow the light down.

however what i was thinking is that air is mostly free space anyway, so does a photon actually travel at speed c, for most of the time, but it is 'held up' by some kind of interaction with an electron? so it's actual speed doesn't really change, but it's trip time increases due to these interactions... so when a photon travels from A-D, it must 'stop' at B and C along the way, but it does travel from A-B at speed c and the same for B-D. it is just the fact that whatever happens at those points takes some time to occur

please let me know if that's a sensible idea or not.

thanks, lntz.
 
Science news on Phys.org
lntz said:
so what i am about to write is quite possibly wrong, but this is just how i was thinking about why the speed of light is different in a vacuum as it is in glass or water etc. i am writing this to see whether my train of thought is on the right lines, and if it isn't to hopefully get an insight into the way i should think about it.

if the speed of light, c, is 3x10^8 ms-1 approx. in a vacuum (free space), because there is nothing there for the light to 'knock into' or interact, and therefore nothing to slow it down, i think of it as a kind of 'resistance' (i know this isn't a correct term to use here, but they're similar ideas). and in air the speed of light is somewhat slower due to the fact that there are particles moving about in this free space, i might assume, that it is these particles that slow the light down.

however what i was thinking is that air is mostly free space anyway, so does a photon actually travel at speed c, for most of the time, but it is 'held up' by some kind of interaction with an electron? so it's actual speed doesn't really change, but it's trip time increases due to these interactions... so when a photon travels from A-D, it must 'stop' at B and C along the way, but it does travel from A-B at speed c and the same for B-D. it is just the fact that whatever happens at those points takes some time to occur

please let me know if that's a sensible idea or not.

thanks, lntz.

In some senses you are on the right track. It is the interactions between light and the media which cause the effective speed of light in that medium to slow down. Thus, the effects of these interactions, averaged over the whole medium, manifest in the permittivity, permeability, index, etc.

However, for solid media, like glass, it is not really correct that atomic level interactions like you have described solely determine the optical properties of the media. In solids the collective response of the constituent atoms becomes very important.

Zapperz has a great post on this topic in the FAQ:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511177
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top