Sphereically Symmetric potential well

gronke
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle that movies in three dimensions is trapped in a deep spherically symmetric potential V(r):

V(r) = 0 at r < r_{}0
--> ∞ at r ≥ r_{}0

where r_{}0 is a positive constant. The ground state wave function is spherically symmetric, so the radial wave function u(r) satisfies the one-dimensional Schroedinger energy eigenvalue equation (6.17) with the boundary condition u(0) = 0 (eq. 6.18).

Using the known boundary conditions on the radial wave function u(r) at r = 0 and r = r_{}0, find the ground state energy of the particle in this potential well.


Homework Equations


6.17
-\hbar^{2}/2m d^{2}/dr^{2}u(r) + V(r)u(r) = Eu(r)

6.18
u(r) = rψ(r)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that there is no potential V(r) to deal with, since it is zero inside the well and infinite outside.

I also know that ψ is zero at r_{}0 and finite at zero.

So, that leaves me with finding a solution to

-\hbar^{2}/2m d^{2}/dr^{2}u(r) = Eu(r)

which I am a bit confounded with. Even then, how do I go from a solution to that to finding the ground state energy?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a differential equation that should hopefully be familiar to you from your basic DiffEq class. It may help to eliminate some of the constants to clean it up a bit:

\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} u(r) = -A^2 u(r)

Where A = \sqrt{2mE/\hbar^2}. See if you can work out the basic type of function that will satisfy this equation (hint: what function yields minus itself when differentiated twice?)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top