Spherical cloud of molecular nitrogen problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the critical radius for Jean's collapse of a spherical cloud of molecular nitrogen at a uniform pressure of 1 atm and a temperature of 300 K. Participants are also considering a similar analysis for a cloud of molecular hydrogen under the same conditions, comparing results to the radii of the Earth and the Sun.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply Jean's criterion to derive the critical radius, with some expressing concerns about the assumptions of uniform pressure and the implications of gravitational collapse. There are discussions about the relationships between mass, pressure, and temperature, and how these affect the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided algebraic manipulations and expressions for mass and number of molecules in terms of temperature and pressure. There is ongoing verification of these expressions, with requests for confirmation of correctness. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the assumptions of uniform pressure and the nature of gravitational collapse.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the units used for molar mass and the implications of numerical factors in the calculations. There is a recognition that the problem may involve more complexity than initially assumed, with references to the need for a pressure gradient in a collapsing cloud.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
How big would a spherical cloud of molecular nitrogen at a uniformed pressure of 1 atm (1x10^5 Pascal) and a temperature of 300 K have to be for it to collapse under the mutual gravitational attraction of its molecules? i.e., What is the critical radius for Jean's collapse of a nitrogen cloud initially at this temperature and pressure? Compare your answer with the radius of the Earth and comment. Repeat for a cloud of molecular hydrogen at a pressure of 1 matm and 300 K and compare this with the radius of the Sun.

jean's criterion is
[tex]\frac{GM^2}{R_{C}} \geq \frac{3}{2} NkT[/tex] where N is the number of molecules
[tex]R_{C} \geq \frac{2}{3} \frac{GM^2}{NkT}[/tex]
now over to PV = NkT [/tex]
im assuming this gas will form a sphere... so the volume is 4/3 pi r^3
[tex]\frac{GM^2}{R_{C}} \geq \frac{3}{2}PV = 2 \pi P R_{C}^3[/tex]
[tex]R_{C}^4 \leq \frac{GM^2}{2 \pi P}[/tex] (1)
the probem is the MAss of this cloud
PV = n RT where n is the number of moles
[tex]PV = \frac{MRT}{M_{m}}[/tex] where Mm is the molar mass
substituting this into 1
[tex]R_{C}^4 \leq \frac{8GM_{m}^2}{9RT} \pi R_{C}^6[/tex]
so
[tex]R_{C}^2 \leq \frac{9RT}{8GM_{m} \pi}[/tex]
is this fine?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone help/confirm this answer, please?
 
How big would a spherical cloud of molecular nitrogen at a uniformed pressure of 1 atm (1x10^5 Pascal) and a temperature of 300 K have to be for it to collapse under the mutual gravitational attraction of its molecules?
The problem is outside of my area of expertise, and probably Space Tiger would have an answer.

However, it would seem the question in quotes is somewhat contradictory.

Any cloud with a mass that would cause it to collapse, would not have a uniform pressure of 1 atm (105 Pa), but rather a pressure gradient.

I am guessing that the answer is something like - To collapse, the attractive force due to gravity at the outer radius must be such that the molecular velocity (mean or most probable?) must be less than the escape velocity at that radius.
 
Alright, you went in several circles here and made a mistake near the end (your answer is only in terms of temperature), so I suggest starting over and looking at what you want your answer to be expressed in terms of. You're given a temperature and pressure, so what you want is the radius of the cloud in terms of its temperature and pressure.

You start with the Jeans condition, which has the following variables: R_C, M, T, and N. To answer the question, you want it to contain: R_C, T, and P. This means you'll want to express and M and N in terms of T and P. You're most of the way there with:

[tex]PV=NkT[/tex]

and

[tex]PV=\frac{M}{M_m}RT[/tex]

Given all these things, can you give me expressions for M and N in terms of T and P? Once you have that, it's just plug and chug.
 
ok so we know [tex]R_{C} = \frac{2}{3} \frac{GM^2}{NkT}[/tex]
[tex]N = \frac{PV}{kT}[/tex]
[tex]M = \frac{PVM_{m}}{RT}[/tex]
[tex]R_{C} \geq \frac{2}{3} \frac{GM^2}{PV}[/tex]
[tex]R_{C} \geq \frac{2}{3} \frac{GPVM_{m}^2}{R^2 T^2}[/tex]
and the volume is that a sphere [tex]V = \frac{4}{3} \pi R_{C}^3[/tex]
\[tex]R_{C} \geq \frac{2}{3} \frac{GPM_{m}^2}{R^2 T^2} \frac{4}{3} \pi R_{C}^3[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{R_{C}^2} \geq \frac{8}{9} \frac{GM_{m}^2 P \pi}{R^2 T^2}[/tex]
invert and invert the signs as well
[tex]R_{C}^2 \leq \frac{9R^2 T^2}{8GM_{m}^2 P \pi}[/tex]
good?

if you don't mind could you look at this thread of mine
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=108178
the prof said the the problem is easier than it seems... but is it really so easy??
 
Last edited:
so is the 'corrected' derivation seen in post #3 correct? It does involve both pressure and temperature... is this correct?
 
so is this correct? I just want to finish off with this question!
 
stunner5000pt said:
so is this correct? I just want to finish off with this question!

I don't see any problems with your algebra. Plug in numbers and see what you get.
 
i get an answer that is 2.1 * 10^4 m. My prof says that the answer should be between 10 and 100 times the Earth's radius which i 6.38x10^6 m
 
  • #10
stunner5000pt said:
i get an answer that is 2.1 * 10^4 m. My prof says that the answer should be between 10 and 100 times the Earth's radius which i 6.38x10^6 m

I get something closer to what your teacher gets. Can you show explicitly the numbers and units of what you're plugging in?
 
  • #11
a possbile problem of mine could haev been that i was not using kg/mol for the molar mass
after tht correction i got 2.1 x 10^7 m

r = 8.314 J/mol K
T= 300 K
G = 6.67 x 10 ^ -11 N m^2/kg^2
P = 10^5 Pa
Mm = 0.02802 kg/mol (molecular nitrogen)
 
  • #12
stunner5000pt said:
a possbile problem of mine could haev been that i was not using kg/mol for the molar mass
after tht correction i got 2.1 x 10^7 m

Ok, that's what I get too. It's still a bit smaller than expected, but there are numerical factors that we've neglected. For example, I think the proper Jeans condition is:

[tex]3NkT < \frac{GM^2}{R_c}[/tex]

which should increase the answer by a factor of root 2. I don't see anything else wrong, but it's possible I'm missing something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K