How Can Spherical Harmonics Represent Functions with Higher Angular Dependence?

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8


1. Homework Statement
upload_2015-9-13_12-23-43.png

Homework Equations



Here we have to express ##\psi(\theta,\phi)## in terms of spherical harmonics ##Y_{lm}## to find the angular momentum.

If ##\psi(\theta,\phi) = i \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}} \sin{\theta} \sin{\phi} ##, it can be written as:
$$ \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} (Y_{1,1}- Y_{1,-1})$$
since :
## Y_{1,\pm1} = \mp \sqrt{\frac{3}{8\pi}} \sin{\theta} e^{\pm i \phi}##,

But now as ##\psi(\theta,\phi)## has ##\sin{3 \phi}## instead of ##\sin{ \phi}##, how will it be represented ?S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, since L_z = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}, the \theta-dependence is irrelevant. So the real question is: how do you write sin 3\phi as a sum of terms of the form e^{i m \phi}?
 
## \sin{3\phi} = \frac{e^{3i\phi } - e^{-3i\phi } }{2i} ## , but alternatively I want to express ## \sin{3\phi} ## in terms of ## \sin{\phi} ## (I guess ), in order to use ##Y_{1,\pm 1}##. Also I tried to find any ##Y_{lm}## defined by ## \sin{m\phi} ## or ## e^{\pm3i\phi } ## but I didn't find, look for example at Table : 5.2 " [Nouredine_Zettili]_Quantum_Mechanics_Concepts ". So any ideas ..
 
Safinaz said:
## \sin{3\phi} = \frac{e^{3i\phi } - e^{-3i\phi } }{2i} ## , but alternatively I want to express ## \sin{3\phi} ## in terms of ## \sin{\phi} ## (I guess ), in order to use ##Y_{1,\pm 1}##. Also I tried to find any ##Y_{lm}## defined by ## \sin{m\phi} ## or ## e^{\pm3i\phi } ## but I didn't find, look for example at Table : 5.2 " [Nouredine_Zettili]_Quantum_Mechanics_Concepts ". So any ideas ..

Why do you want to write it in terms of Y_{1, \pm 1}? In general, you write a function f(\theta, \phi) in the form:

f(\theta, \phi) = \sum_{m l}C_{lm} Y_{lm} (\theta, \phi)

Since each Y_{lm} \propto e^{im\phi}, there are only two terms involved in the sum over m: m=\pm 3. So your case boils down to:

sin(\theta) sin(3 \phi) = \sum_l (C_{l, +3} Y_{l, +3} + C_{l, -3} Y_{l, -3})

You don't actually need to solve for the coefficients C_{l, \pm 3}
 
To elaborate on what steven said, you could find the coefficients ##C_{lm}## by using the orthogonality of the spherical harmonics:
$$C_{lm} = \int Y^*_{lm}(\theta,\phi) \psi(\theta,\phi)\,d\Omega.$$ Try evaluating the phi integral, and you'll see why ##m=\pm 3## and why the ##\theta## dependence doesn't really matter in this problem.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top