Spin-3/2 particle and degeneracy in excited state

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606

Homework Statement



Consider a particle with mass m in the following 1D potential:
<br /> V(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} mgx \ \ \ x&gt;0 \\ \infty \ \ \ \ \ \ \ x\leq 0 \end{array} \right.<br />
What is its minimum energy calculated using the uncertainty relation?

Homework Equations



<br /> \Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



My problem is, I don't know what to use for \Delta x! I see no length scale I can use. The only thing that came into my mind was making a constant with the dimension of length using the available constants and so I got \alpha(\frac{\hbar^2}{gm^2})^{\frac 1 3}(where \alpha is a dimensionless constant) and this gives \Delta p \geq \frac{1}{2\alpha} (m^2 \hbar g)^{\frac 1 3} \Rightarrow E_0=\frac{1}{8\alpha^2} (m \hbar^2 g^2)^{\frac 1 3}.
But the problem is, this method can give any multiple of (m \hbar^2 g^2)^{\frac 1 3}!
What should I do?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
TSny said:
I'm not sure exactly what the questioner had in mind. But it might be similar to the fairly well-known example of using the uncertainty principle to estimate the ground state energy of the hydrogen atom.

See

http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node98.html

http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~rt19/hydro/node1.html

http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/astro/AST1100/h06/undervisningsmateriale/lecture-2.pdf

Thanks man, it was very helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top