Spin hamiltionian with respect to certain basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heimisson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Spin
Heimisson
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle with spin 1/2 and magnetic moment is in a magnetic field B=B_0(1,1,0). At time t=0 the particle has the spin 1/2 \hbar in the z direction.

i) Write the hamiltonian with respect to the basis that is defined by the eigenvectors of \widehat{S}_z


Homework Equations


\widehat{S}_z = \hbar /2<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1<br /> \end{array} \right)


The Attempt at a Solution



So finding the hamiltonian is trivial:
H=-\gamma \textbf{B} \cdot \textbf{S} =<br /> = B_0 \hbar /2<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 0 &amp; 1-i \\<br /> 1+i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array} \right)
if my calculations are right. But what I don't really don't understand is what I wrote in the bold font. I thought I had to find the matrix A so:

if:
B=<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 0 &amp; 1-i \\<br /> 1+i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array} \right)

A \widehat{S}_z = B \Rightarrow A = B \widehat{S}_z^{-1}

but this is really just a shot in the dark I'm not really sure why I should do this.
It would be great if someone could shed some light on this I'm sort of rusty in linear algebra of finite vectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With respect to the basis defined by the eigenvectors of S_z is just the usual basis of spin up = (1,0) and spin down = (0,1), for which the spin matrices are the Pauli matrices, i.e.
S_z = (1,0)(0,-1). In general you define S_z (and analogue S_x and S_y) by S_z |spin up> = |spin up> and S_z |spin down> = - |spin down>, so your explicit matrix expression for S_z changes if you use a basis of, say, 1/sqrt(2)(up+down) = (1,0) and 1/sqrt(2)(up-down) = (0,1).
(as an exercise, you may calculate S_z in that basis)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top