I Understanding the Spin-Statistics Theorem: A Modern Notation Approach

Physics news on Phys.org
filip97 said:
i read that question and Weinberg book (A,B)-Representation of Lorentz Group: Coefficient functions of fields

why u(a,b)=Cab/sqrt(2m) ?

where Cab is Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and m is mass of particle
Basically because transformations on ##u_{ab}(0,\sigma)## for a massive particle are transformations that don't alter momentum by boosting to another frame, i.e. occur in one frame and don't involve translation. The only transformations then are rotations, thus they are Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
 
DarMM said:
Basically because transformations on ##u_{ab}(0,\sigma)## for a massive particle are transformations that don't alter momentum by boosting to another frame, i.e. occur in one frame and don't involve translation. The only transformations then are rotations, thus they are Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

Formulas please
 
filip97 said:
Formulas please
Weinberg has all the formulae, I'd just be repeating him. I thought you wanted the reasoning as such, what gap does Weinberg's text have for you?
 
DarMM said:
Weinberg has all the formulae, I'd just be repeating him. I thought you wanted the reasoning as such, what gap does Weinberg's text have for you?
I think formulas in modern notation, i don't understand weinberg notation for sst , thanks !
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top