Spinning magnetic field through a coil-can this propel engines?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of using a spinning magnetic field through a coil to propel engines, suggesting that this setup could generate torque to spin a heavier object like a ship propeller. However, participants express skepticism about the practicality of this motor configuration, questioning the efficiency and energy requirements. It is highlighted that directly spinning the propeller shaft would require significantly more energy than the proposed method. Concerns are raised about the notion of creating an over-unity engine, which is deemed impossible as energy cannot be created from nothing. Ultimately, the consensus is that the idea lacks feasibility due to fundamental energy conservation principles.
ARAVIND113122
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Spinning magnetic field through a coil-can this propel engines??

Magnetic field through a coil produces torque in the coil. Suppose we have a coil.The set up is such that the magnetic field passes through the coil.Now,if we spin the magnetic field along with the coil,the coil will keep spinning.an axle can be connected to the coil.and a much heavier object,say a ship propeller can be attached to the axle.as the field spins[this can be done by keeping a very powerful horseshoe magnet over the coil and spinning the magnet],the coil will spin,and the axle along with the propeller will spin. Is this possible??
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org


ARAVIND113122 said:
Magnetic field through a coil produces torque in the coil. Suppose we have a coil.The set up is such that the magnetic field passes through the coil.Now,if we spin the magnetic field along with the coil,the coil will keep spinning.an axle can be connected to the coil.and a much heavier object,say a ship propeller can be attached to the axle.as the field spins[this can be done by keeping a very powerful horseshoe magnet over the coil and spinning the magnet],the coil will spin,and the axle along with the propeller will spin. Is this possible??

It does not sound like a practical motor configuration.

Instead of spinning the magnet, why not just spin the propeller shaft directly?
 


This is because it will take a lot more energy to propel the shaft directly.The idea is to use very little energy to spin the magnet-the torque by the magnet will then spin much heavier objects.
 


ARAVIND113122 said:
This is because it will take a lot more energy to propel the shaft directly.The trick is to use very little energy to spin the magnet-the torque by the magnet will then spin much heavier objects.

False. Sounds like you are trying to come up with an over-unity engine, or similar. Discussions of such (impossible) devices are not allowed on the PF.
 


But sir,can you please tell me where exactly i am going wrong?
 


ARAVIND113122 said:
But sir,can you please tell me where exactly i am going wrong?

You are going wrong in thinking that you can get more energy out than you put in. The energy has to come from somewhere. There is no "magic" energy.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top