Splitting field with Galios group A4

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Kata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Group Splitting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the splitting field of the polynomial x^4+8x+12=0, which has the Galois group A4. Participants explore the relationships between the roots and the structure of the field generated by them, considering both the degree of the field and the implications for the Galois group.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the roots of the polynomial and expresses uncertainty about the splitting field.
  • Another participant suggests that the splitting field is generated by the roots and questions if a smaller set of generators is needed.
  • Concerns are raised about the degree of the field, with one participant arguing that simply attaching two roots would not yield the correct degree.
  • A participant describes their progress in expressing the polynomial in terms of its roots and defines a field F generated by one of the roots.
  • There is a discussion about whether one of the roots can be expressed in terms of the others, with implications for the Galois group being discussed.
  • Another participant proposes a potential form for the splitting field based on their assumptions about the Galois group.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the splitting field or the relationships between the roots. There are competing views on how to approach the problem, and uncertainty remains regarding the implications for the Galois group.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the relationships between the roots and the structure of the field, but these assumptions are not universally accepted or resolved within the discussion.

Jim Kata
Messages
198
Reaction score
10
the polynomial x^4+8x+12=0 has the Galois group A4. I have all its roots, but can't figure out its splitting field. The roots are
[tex]\alpha_1=\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{\cos{(\pi/9)}}+i\sqrt{\cos{(2\pi/9)}}+i\sqrt{\cos{(4\pi/9)}})[/tex]

[tex]\alpha_2=\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{\cos{(\pi/9)}} - i\sqrt{\cos{(2\pi/9)}}-i\sqrt{\cos{(4\pi/9)}})[/tex]

[tex]\alpha_3=\sqrt{2}(-\sqrt{\cos{(\pi/9)}} + i\sqrt{\cos{(2\pi/9)}}-i\sqrt{\cos{(4\pi/9)}})[/tex]

[tex]\alpha_4=\sqrt{2}(-\sqrt{\cos{(\pi/9)}} - i\sqrt{\cos{(2\pi/9)}}+i\sqrt{\cos{(4\pi/9)}})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean? its the field generated by those roots. do you want a smaller set of generators? (presumably two of those would do.)
 
hellooo?
 
Sorry I didn't respond earlier, but I don't think it is as simple as just attaching two roots since the degree of the field in that case wouldn't be twelve.
 
Jim Kata said:
Sorry I didn't respond earlier, but I don't think it is as simple as just attaching two roots since the degree of the field in that case wouldn't be twelve.
Why not?

What can you say about, e.g., the minimal polynomial of a2 in the field Q(a1)?

It can't be x4 + 8x + 12, because this polynomial is reducible over Q(a1)! (it has a root)
 
Last edited:
I think I get what you're saying let me mess with this idea for a bit and get back to you.
 
Here is where I am at.

[tex]x^4+8x+12=(x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)(x-\alpha_3)(x-\alpha_4)=(x^3+\alpha_1x^2+{\alpha_1}^2x+({\alpha_1}^3+8))(x-\alpha_1)=0[/tex]

So I define [tex]F \equiv \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1)[/tex] So it is obvious that the coefficients of that cubic are in the field [tex]F \equiv \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1)[/tex] and that the roots of that cubic are [tex]\alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4[/tex] but it is not obvious to me that [tex]\alpha_3[/tex] can be written in terms of [tex]\alpha_2[/tex] and the field [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1)[/tex] making the the Galois group of the cubic [tex]\mathbb{Z_3}[/tex]
 
I guess I just have to assume that's the case since if it wasn't the Galois group would be S4 not A4. In that case I get a splitting field:
[tex]\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)= A +B\alpha_1 + C{\alpha_1}^2 + D{\alpha_1}^3 + E\alpha_2 + F\alpha_1\alpha_2 +G{\alpha_1}^2\alpha_2 +H{\alpha_1}^3\alpha_2 + I{\alpha_2}^2 + J\alpha_1{\alpha_2}^2 + K{\alpha_1}^2{\alpha_2}^2 +L{\alpha_1}^3{\alpha_2}^2[/tex] Is this correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K