Spring and gravitational energies (Simple harmonic motion)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the combined spring and gravitational energies for a mass m hanging from a light spring with force constant k. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the expression for potential energy and the derivation of the terms involved, particularly the inclusion of the 1/2 factor from h/2.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of relative energy and the choice of datum in potential energy calculations. Some suggest sketching the scenario to better understand the energies involved, while others question the clarity of the problem setup regarding the gravitational potential energy reference point.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on how to approach the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationship between gravitational and spring forces at equilibrium, but no consensus has been reached regarding the interpretation of the energy terms or the setup's clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the gravitational potential energy reference point is not explicitly defined in the problem setup, leading to some confusion about the calculations and assumptions being made.

ichivictus
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show that the combined spring energy and gravitational energy for a mass m hanging from a light spring of force constant k can be expressed as 1/2 ky2, where y is the distance above or below the equilibrium position.

Figure shows a block connected to spring, where equilibrium is, and where the spring's unstretched position is. The distance from unstretched position to equilibrium is defined as h. From equilibirum to mass is y.


The answer starts off as

U = 1/2 k(h+y)2 - mg((h/2) +y)

From there it says mg=kh and substitutes for mg then solves.

I'm confused how U equals all that. I get how potential energy of a spring is 1/2 kx^2 for a spring or mgh in other cases, but this is quite confusing.

Then where did the 1/2 from h/2 come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer I can think of is that all energy is relative. So if the datum is conveniently chosen so that some variables drop out then that is still valid.

As an alternate approach, why don't you assume a datum distance of "d" and assume the two terms can be set to ky^2. Then solve for d.
 
The potential energies are relative - but the position the values are relative to is provided as part of the problem setup.
(Well - sort of...)

The idea is that the equilibrium position is defined to be where the force of gravity is the same as the force of the spring ... since gravity is a constant, and the spring is extended by length h, this means: kh=mg

To understand the original equation, first sketch out what they are describing and then work out the energies, and add them up.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The potential energies are relative - but the position the values are relative to is provided as part of the problem setup.
Nonsense. The gravitational potential energy datum is not given at all in the set up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
982
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K