Calculating Spring Constant and Energy Conservation: How Fast Will the Bag Drop?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the spring constant and analyzing the motion of a 3kg bag attached to a vertical spring. The spring constant was initially calculated as k=73.5 N/m based on the formula k=mg/x. Participants debated the correct application of energy conservation principles to determine the bag's velocity after dropping 40 cm and the maximum distance it would fall before reversing direction. Clarification was sought on whether to use gravitational potential energy (GPE) solely for kinetic energy (KE) calculations or to include elastic potential energy (EPE) as well. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining GPE lost to find the bag's displacement and acceleration at various points in its motion.
MarieMarie94
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
1. Problem Statement:
A vertical spring has one end attached to the ceiling and a 3kg bag attached to the other one. When the system is at rest, the spring is stretched by 40cm. 1) determine the spring constant. 2) Let the bag drop from a position in which the spring is not deformed. Using the conservation of energy law, find: how fast the bag is moving after it drops 40 cm, and how far down the bag will drop before starting to come back. Calculate and show the direction of the bag's acceleration when the bag is at the highest, lowest, and middle of the oscillation positions.

Homework Equations

:[/B]
K=mg/x
KE=1/2m(v^2)
GPE=mgh
EPE=1/2k(x^2)

3. Attempt at the Solution:
So I found a spring constant. I'm not sure if it's correct but I got, k=(3)(9.8)/(.4)= 73.5 N/m. I ran into problems with the rest though. For finding the velocity of the bag dropping 40cm, I did GPE=KE+EPE but I'm not sure if that's right. As for the farthest distance the bag would drop and the acceleration, I wasn't exactly sure how to approach them.

Update: To find the velocity at 40cm, should it actually only be GPE=KE because we're treating the 40cm as our equilibrium? And then to find the farthest distance the bag would drop would it be GPE=EPE to find our displacement? Or am I completely wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
MarieMarie94 said:
GPE=KE+EPE
GPE lost = KE gained + EPE gained, yes.
MarieMarie94 said:
to find the farthest distance the bag would drop would it be GPE=EPE to find our displacement
Yes, but what is the GPE lost in this case?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but what is the GPE lost in this case?
Would it be (3)(9.8)(d) because we don't know the distance?
 
MarieMarie94 said:
Would it be (3)(9.8)(d) because we don't know the distance?
Right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top