MATLAB Spring mass impact system in Matlab - How to correct it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling a spring mass damper system in Simulink, where the user initially struggles to achieve the expected sinusoidal displacement. The key issue identified is the use of an energy-based equation that does not account for the changing signs of force, which is crucial for sinusoidal behavior. The suggested correction involves using a force-based governing equation, which requires setting up a system of first-order equations for position and velocity. The user also seeks clarification on how to input initial velocity and expresses concerns about unexpected damping effects in their simulation results. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly formulating the equations of motion for accurate modeling in Simulink.
k.udhay
Messages
167
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
A mass of constant velocity colliding on spring is modeled in simulink. Result expected was to be of sinusoidal displacement of spring. However result found was different.
I am new to Simulink and I wanted to start practicing using a spring mass damper system. My first tutorial was this:



Later, I wanted to model a spring system where a mass moving at a known velocity hits the spring. The governing equation and a similar modeling method given in the previous youtube link was also prepared:

244939
Here is the Matlab Simulink model:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AiW7GXWiq-LLgitdmZqU4QhFeVU5?e=PiZxp3

The result I expected was a sinusoidal displacement of the spring. However the result was totally different:

244940


If someone can tell what exactly is my mistake and the correction, that will be of huge help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're using an energy equation where all the terms are positive. It is not going to tell you the signs of ##x## or of ##v##.

To get the equation of motion, you want to use the fact that the force on the mass is related to the displacement ##F = -kx = m \frac {d^2x}{dt^2}## This force will change sign as ##x## changes sign, which will lead to the sinusoidal behavior.
 
  • Love
Likes k.udhay
Please update at some point and let me know if my observation actually led to success. It was just something that jumped out at me looking at your equation.
 
Thank you for your inputs, RPinPA. While I understand force based equation will give me sinusoidal displacement output (as mentioned in the youtube link in OP), I have two questions that I need a clarity:

1. Why will the energy based governing equation not give correct displacement values? It involves velocity (which is a derivative of position) too.

2. If I go with force based governing equation (as you have suggested), where do I input the initial velocity of the mass? This is critical as this determines the amount of deformation of spring (= amplitude of sine wave)
 
k.udhay said:
Thank you for your inputs, RPinPA. While I understand force based equation will give me sinusoidal displacement output (as mentioned in the youtube link in OP), I have two questions that I need a clarity:

1. Why will the energy based governing equation not give correct displacement values? It involves velocity (which is a derivative of position) too.
Because you can't tell whether to take the velocity as positive or negative at any given time. Both are solutions.

k.udhay said:
2. If I go with force based governing equation (as you have suggested), where do I input the initial velocity of the mass? This is critical as this determines the amount of deformation of spring (= amplitude of sine wave)

Well if you were solving this analytically, you'd have a functional expression for ##x(t)## with some free parameters and you'd evaluate its derivative at ##t = 0## to use the information on ##v(0)##.

I don't know much about Simulink but I assume you are implementing differential equations and the software takes care of evolving a solution numerically from starting conditions. So here's a more convenient form for that.

A common transformation of 2nd order equations is to turn it into a system of 1st order equations.
So we have this:
$$-kx = m\frac {d^2x}{dt^2}$$

Change it to this equivalent system in the two variables ##v## and ##x##:
$$\frac {dx}{dt} = v \\
m\frac {dv}{dt} = -kx$$
Implement those two equations in those two unknowns with the desired initial conditions on ##x## and ##v##.
 
  • Love
Likes k.udhay
I should emphasize that my comments are about the mathematics of the differential equations you're solving, as I have no expertise in Simulink. I have used Matlab for decades but managed to avoid ever using Simulink or even having it on a computer I was using.
 
  • Like
Likes k.udhay
Thanks a lot. I will try this and update you.
 
@RPinPA - I tried this in Simulink and there is actually a progress:

245203


However, I see some form of dampening effect in all position, velocity and acceleration plots. I am unable to understand the reason for this. This is my simulink model:
245204


The initial condition (40) tells that dx/dt = 40 when t = 0. I am not very sure if this way of inputting is right. I will be so glad if someone of PF helped me out of this issue. Thank you for guiding me very closely.
 
Back
Top