[ Spring pendulum ] Centrifugal Force transmissibility

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating force transmissibility in a spring pendulum system subjected to rotation. Participants consider whether centrifugal force can be treated as an excitation force influencing the system's vibration. It is noted that the spring's restoring force maintains tension during rotation, affecting oscillation behavior. The idea of comparing normal mass-on-a-spring oscillations in a rotating environment, such as a space station, is also mentioned. Overall, the inquiry seeks to quantify the impact of rotation on the system's vibration dynamics.
nzur
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

I just wonder how you guys think about this.

Assume that there is a spring pendulum rotating at hinge (Free swing or forced swing).

In this case, can I calculate force transmissibility (transmitted force amplitude to ground via spring devided by centrifugal force amplitude) ?

or is it not logical because centrifugal force is not excitation force to the system ?

The point is, if there is a rotation, spring would vibrate more than the case w/o rotation. So I want to quantify how much the rotation affect to the vibration.

Does it make sense to you?

Any kind of comment will be very appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you construct a pendulum so the usual string is replaced by a spring, you get what is more usually the case - a real pendulum string is a bit stretchy. The restoring force from the spring provides the tension keeping it on a curved path.

The other image that comes to mind is a rotor made from a mass on the end of a spring.

To both systems you could add oscillations.

If you wanted to know how the normal mass-on-a-spring oscillations are affected by being in a rotating system - then it would make sense to use centrifugal force (eg. if you did the mass-on-a-spring experiment inside a rotating space-station).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top