Spring System with Variable Tensions, functions of displacement.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the dynamics of two masses connected to springs colliding on a frictionless surface. The springs have linear tension functions, and the challenge lies in setting up the equations of motion post-collision. Participants suggest using center-of-mass coordinates to simplify the problem, emphasizing the conservation of momentum and energy. The initial setup involves defining forces at the collision point and ensuring the equations account for the interaction of the springs. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a clearer visualization and a structured approach to the equations involved.
SpeeDFX
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
So...I want to solve the problem where two masses on springs collide into each other on a frictionless surface. The two masses are different, and both springs' tensions are linear functions of x.

The two mass-springs collide into each other, each having some initial speed V1 and V2,and the springs stick together end to end. I want to find the equations of motion for each mass after the collision (1 dimensional).

I'm getting stuck on how to set up the equations, and then, figuring out what kind of equations I'm dealing with.

Right now, I have the problem set up in my head like the following. M1 (attached to to spring with K1(X1) ) comes in from the left and M2 (with K2(X2)) comes in from the right. then the springs stick together and start doing their things. I'm taking the point of view from M1.

F(onto M2) = Ktotal*Xtotal = M2*Xtotal'', where Xtotal'' is the acceleration of M2 from perspective of M1.

also, I'm calling "B" the point at which the springs stick together

F(at B)= 0 = K1(X1)*X1 = K2(X2)*X2

with these 2 eqn's, I'm stuck. Even if I use the solution to a simple harmonic oscillator, I end up having X1 and X2 inside the cosine and sine functions as well as outside. I don't know if this is OK and I don't know how to deal with it. lol. someone help me please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woops. I meant...

F(at B)= 0 = K1(X1)*X1 - K2(X2)*X2
 
SpeeDFX said:
The two mass-springs collide into each other, each having some initial speed V1 and V2,and the springs stick together end to end.

Hi SpeeDFX! :smile:

I'm not visualising this …

if the masses collide, where are the springs?

how can they stick together end to end? :confused:
 
each mass has a spring sticking straight out of it.

I guess a better way to describe it would be the following..


2 masses with springs are attached in the followin order.

mass1_spring1_spring2_mass2


the masses have some initial velocity toward each other
 
use centre-of-mass coordinates!

Hi SpeeDFX! :smile:

Ah! So two springs collide into each other on a frictionless surface, and they have masses at their other ends. :smile:

Hint: change to a coordinate system in which the centre of mass is stationary!

Momentum is conserved in all collisions, so it'll remain stationary.

(That'll make all the calculations much easier.)

Then use conservation of energy. :smile:
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top