Springs and friction and energy, etc.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a block compressed against a spring, which then slides through a loop. The key equations include the potential energy of the spring, kinetic energy, and gravitational potential energy. The block's energy conservation is central to solving for the compression distance, x, in terms of the spring constant k, mass m, loop radius r, and gravitational acceleration g. Participants clarify that the problem's title mistakenly includes "friction," as friction is neglected in the scenario. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles to arrive at the solution.
sadakaa
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small block of mass m is pressed up
against a spring. The spring has constant k
and is compressed a distance x. The block
slides along a track up and around a loop
of radius r and down and out on the far
side, as shown. At the top of the loop, the
loop exerts a normal force on the block
equal to the weight of the block. Neglect
friction.

Determine the compression distance, x, in terms of given quantities k, m, r and g.

Homework Equations



U_{spring} = 1/2kx^{2}
KE = 1/2mv^{2}
U_{grav} = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



I started with energy conservation, but I am not sure if you just set U_{spring} equal to the sum of KE and U_{grav}

The picture of the problem can be seen here: http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/7804/41935428tm6.th.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if I understood the problem. Why is the problem called Springs and FRICTION and energy?

However, I would start with the loop:

You know that in the look, the gravitational potential is equal to the energy of the block. Therefore:

E_{kin}+m\cdot g\cdot h\cdot= U_{grav}

where h is equal to two times the radius r.

Now, you can set up another equation because you know that the energy of the block at the beginning was zero (no kinetic energy and no gravitational energy):

E_{kin}= 1/2\cdot k\cdot x^{2}

Now, you should know how to solve the problem...
 
mistake on title

yea sorry about the title, it wouldn't let me edit it though. :-p

thanks for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top