Springs and masses connected together in a line

  • Thread starter Thread starter iiJDSii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Springs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving four masses connected by three springs, requiring the formulation of equations of motion using f = ma principles. The original poster expresses frustration over repeatedly encountering this problem in various courses without retaining the solution. Participants suggest that memorization may not be necessary, as variations in the problem can occur, such as differing numbers of masses or spring constants. They also mention alternative approaches like Hamiltonian or Lagrangian mechanics for solving such problems. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying concepts rather than rote memorization.
iiJDSii
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So there are 4 masses in a line. They are connected by 3 springs between them, denoted by k_12 & l_12 (spring coefficient + natural extension length), k_23 & l_23, etc.

Homework Equations



Write down the f = ma equations of motion for all 4 masses.

The Attempt at a Solution



See my image.



This problem really annoys me because I always learn how to do it for the test but never remember. I think I've gone through 3 courses where this problem came up and every time I could never remember. Well now it's just a random exercise in a linear algebra text I'm reading and I wouldn't mind learning it right once and for all. After all I'm supposed to be an engineer.

Thank you for any help.
 

Attachments

  • spring_masses.jpg
    spring_masses.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
Well do you really need to memorize the problem? Besides, the time you do, someone will give you one with 5 or 3 masses, or springs with varying k :)

It's like this one only with four masses instead of two. (You could use the Hamiltonian or Lagrangian mechanics of course.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top