Springs in series and parallel : Problem for U

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a question regarding the compression of two identical springs when subjected to a force in series versus parallel. The original answer given was 2.5 cm for the parallel configuration, which was confirmed as correct by other participants. The logic explained includes that in series, each spring compresses by 5 cm under a 5 kg force, while in parallel, the force is divided, resulting in 2.5 kg per spring, leading to a 2.5 cm compression. There was a clarification needed regarding the units of force, as one participant mistakenly referred to force in Newtons instead of kilograms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct spring constants and units in such calculations.
sss_1981
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I came across an objective question on the topic 'Springs in series and parallel' .. Have i asnwered it correctly?

Q. A Force of 5Kg compresses 2 springs in series by 10 cm. What will be the compression when the same force acts on the same 2 springs but when the springs are in parallel?

Choices >>
1) 5 cm
2) 10 cm
3) 2.5 cm
4) 20 cm

MY ANSWER >> 2.5 cm

Please correct me if I am wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct !
though it should have been mentioned that the springs are identical but as nothing is mentioned we can take them to be identical
 
Thanks buddy...

Oh yes, U r spot on.. I forgot to mention that the springs are identical..

The logic I followed was >>

In series,
* The compression is 10 cm
* This means each spring compresses by 5cm
* Since the springs are in series, both the springs experience the full 5 kg
force
* So, each spring compresses 1 cm for 1 kg (Spring constant=1)

In parallel,
* Now, the force is divided between the 2 springs
* So, force acting on each spring is 2.5 N
* So, in this case, the spring compresses to 2.5xSpring constant(1) = 2.5 cm

Hope I am right with my logic too.. Sorry, I should have mentioned this earlier:biggrin:
 
most welcome

well...your logic seems correct but some problem in units.

u say spring constant is 1??
if its 1 it must be 1 cm/kg wt but in si it will be not be so

but later you say the force on each spring is 2.5 N it can't be its 2.5kg wt

otherwise your soln is correct

n btw ...
if you are preparing for some objective type examinatiom
then you can use
for series
1/k=1/k1+1/k2
and parallel
k=k1+k2
where k is equivalent spring constant
 
Thanx chap..:approve:

(Ooops, the 2nd force that I mentioned is 2.5 KG (Not Newton) ... by mistake I wrote it as 2.5N)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top