Spting Balance in Space(no calculations)

AI Thread Summary
Using a spring balance in space is generally ineffective for measuring weight due to the lack of gravitational force. However, it may be possible to compare the weight of two individuals if the spring balance is specifically designed for that purpose and used in a location with gravity, such as in orbit around a planet. The comparison would rely on the principle that weight is proportional to mass, allowing for the calculation of weight ratios through conservation of momentum. A specialized spring balance could incorporate features like flexible vanes to enhance measurement accuracy. Overall, while challenging, measuring weight ratios in space is theoretically feasible with the right equipment.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Spring Balance in Space(no calculations)

Using a spring balance in space to measure the weight of anything is useless. Is there any way to use a spring balance to compare the weight of two people in space?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
Using a spring balance in space to measure the weight of anything is useless. Is there any way to use a spring balance to compare the weight of two people in space?
If by compare you mean find the ratio of their weights, then if the spring balance were specially designed for the purpose they could do it. First, you have to be talking about a place in space where they actually have some weight (like in orbit around a planet) and you have to believe in the idea that weight is proportional to mass. You could do a measurement to find the ratio of the masses, and from that the ratio of their weights. It would involve conservation of momentum. The spring balance could be something like a slinky spring, with flexible vanes attached to each loop (imagine a small sticky note paper stuck to each coil of the spring).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top