Square array (electric field question)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at point M, the midpoint of the bottom side of a square formed by four charges. Despite having equal distances and angles, the charges do not cancel out at point M due to their arrangement; one side has a positive charge and the other a negative charge. This results in a net electric field at that point. Participants are encouraged to visualize the electric field vectors from each charge to understand why the total field is not zero. The key takeaway is that the configuration of charges leads to a non-zero electric field at point M.
mujadeo
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four charges q1 = q3 = -q and q2 = q4 = +q, where q = 6 µC, are fixed at the corners of a square with sides a = 1.3 m. (see attached .gif)

Calculate the x- and y-components of the net electric field at the midpoint M of the bottom side of the square.



Homework Equations


Why don't the charges cancel in the field??
The distances and angles, are all equal
The charges are opposite.

SO how can there be a net electric field at that point (M)?


The Attempt at a Solution


Homework Statement


havent calc'd anything cause i don't get why field shouldn't be zero


Homework Equations


im totally stuck
thanks for any help sum1.


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • showme2.gif
    showme2.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 320
Physics news on Phys.org
If you were asked to find the field in the middle of the square, then you'd be correct: The field would be zero.

But not at point M. Note that on one side of M there's a +q and on the other side there's a -q. They don't cancel! (If M were in between two similar charges, then you could say that their field cancels.)
 
It's always a good idea to go back to the basics, especially when confused, rather than seeking the shortcut that might not be there.

For each point charge, draw a vector representing its electric field at point M (...paying attention to direction and some sense of relative scale). Draw the vector sum of those electric field vectors. Does it look like the [total] electric field vector at M is zero?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top