Stability of the gaussian under addition and scalar multiplication

stukbv
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
If i have the mgf of X and the mgf of Y where X~N(mx,vx) and Y~N(my,vy) and X and Y are independent ,
then if i want to show that aX +bY ~ N(amx+bmy , a^2vx+b^2vy) how would i do this - need to be able to do the convolutions way and the mgf's way,
for the mgfs way is it just, mgf(ax+by) = mgf(ax) . mgf(bx) if so how do you find mgf(ax) ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi stukbv! :smile:

Sadly, there is no way to easily calculate the mgf of aX when just knowing X (or at least, I don't know such a way). The easiest is by showing in general that the mgf of X\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2) is

M(t)=e^{t\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2t^2}

Then the distribution of aX is

M(at)=e^{at\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2a^2t^2}

And what kind of distribution is this?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top